Suppr超能文献

不同类别膳食补充剂使用者在水果和蔬菜摄入量上的差异。

Differences in fruit and vegetable intake among categories of dietary supplement users.

作者信息

Reedy Jill, Haines Pamela S, Campbell Marci Kramish

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd, MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Nov;105(11):1749-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People who choose to take dietary supplements are often classified as having a healthful lifestyle; however, it is probable that several health behavior patterns exist among users.

OBJECTIVE

Data from the North Carolina Strategies to Improve Diet, Exercise, and Screening study (N = 727) were used to identify and describe five different categories of dietary supplement use and evaluate how these categories are associated with both quantity and quality of fruit and vegetable consumption.

DESIGN

Five nonoverlapping dietary supplement use categories were created and descriptive demographic statistics were compared. Least-squares means were calculated for knowledge and fruit and vegetable quality and quantity measures. Logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios to examine associations among the dietary supplement use categories and the fruit and vegetable measures, using nonusers as the reference category.

RESULTS

Demographic profiles and dietary intake varied among the dietary supplement categories. People reporting both a multivitamin/multimineral and a single supplement (Multi Plus category) and any nonvitamin/nonmineral products (Herbals category) were more likely to be consuming more vegetables and higher-quality fruits and vegetables than those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers category), whereas people taking multivitamins/multiminerals only (Multis category) had patterns that were more consistently similar to those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers).

CONCLUSIONS

Study participants exhibited dietary supplement use patterns that were associated with differences in fruit and vegetable consumption. Simply characterizing people as users and nonusers will not capture critical demographic and dietary differences and will likely further cloud investigations of diet-disease relationships.

摘要

背景

选择服用膳食补充剂的人通常被归类为拥有健康的生活方式;然而,使用者中可能存在几种健康行为模式。

目的

利用北卡罗来纳州改善饮食、运动和筛查策略研究的数据(N = 727)来识别和描述五类不同的膳食补充剂使用情况,并评估这些类别与水果和蔬菜消费的数量和质量之间的关联。

设计

创建了五个不重叠的膳食补充剂使用类别,并比较了描述性人口统计学统计数据。计算了知识、水果和蔬菜质量及数量指标的最小二乘均值。进行逻辑回归以计算调整后的优势比,以使用非使用者作为参照类别来检验膳食补充剂使用类别与水果和蔬菜指标之间的关联。

结果

膳食补充剂类别之间的人口统计学特征和饮食摄入量各不相同。报告同时服用多种维生素/多种矿物质和单一补充剂的人(复合加类)以及任何非维生素/非矿物质产品的人(草药类)比未服用任何膳食补充剂的人(非使用者类)更有可能摄入更多蔬菜和更高质量的水果和蔬菜,而仅服用多种维生素/多种矿物质的人(多种维生素类)的模式与未服用任何膳食补充剂的人(非使用者)更为一致。

结论

研究参与者表现出与水果和蔬菜消费差异相关的膳食补充剂使用模式。简单地将人们分为使用者和非使用者并不能捕捉关键的人口统计学和饮食差异,而且可能会进一步模糊对饮食与疾病关系的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验