Zaffagnini Stefano, Roberti di Sarsina Tommaso, Bonanzinga Tommaso, Nitri Marco, Macchiarola Luca, Stefanelli Federico, Lucidi Gianandrea, Grassi Alberto
II Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Laboratorio di Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Joints. 2018 Feb 12;6(1):10-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626739. eCollection 2018 Mar.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate if the donor age of nonirradiated Achilles tendon allograft could influence the clinical results of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. All patients that underwent ACL revision between 2004 and 2008 with at least 4 years of follow-up were included. For all the patients that met the inclusion criteria, the age of the graft donor was obtained from the tissue bank. Lysholm score was administered to patients that met inclusion criteria. In addition, patients were divided in two groups based on the donor age (<45 years vs. ≥45 years), and the baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Fifty-two patients were evaluated at a mean 4.8 ± 0.8 years follow-up with Lysholm score. The Lysholm significantly improved from 62.3 ± 6.6 at preoperative status to 84.4 ± 12.3 at final follow-up. The mean donor age was 48.7 ± 8.4 years; a significant difference in Lysholm score was noted between patients that received an allograft with a donor age <45 years (14 patients; 27%) and those receiving an allograft with a donor age ≥45 years (38; 73%) (89.5 ± 3.2 vs. 80.1 ± 11.1, respectively; = 0.0469). The multiple regression model showed the donor age, the final follow-up, and the preoperative Lysholm score as significant predictors of postoperative Lysholm score ( < 0.0002). Donor age of nonirradiated Achilles tendon allograft influenced the mid-term results of revision ACL reconstruction, thus advising the use of grafts from young donors. Level III, retrospective comparative study.
本研究的目的是调查未照射的跟腱同种异体移植物的供体年龄是否会影响翻修前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的临床结果。纳入了2004年至2008年间接受ACL翻修且至少随访4年的所有患者。对于所有符合纳入标准的患者,移植物供体的年龄从组织库中获取。对符合纳入标准的患者进行Lysholm评分。此外,根据供体年龄(<45岁与≥45岁)将患者分为两组,并比较基线特征和结果。52例患者在平均4.8±0.8年的随访中接受了Lysholm评分。Lysholm评分从术前的62.3±6.6显著提高到最终随访时的84.4±12.3。供体平均年龄为48.7±8.4岁;接受供体年龄<45岁的同种异体移植物的患者(14例;27%)与接受供体年龄≥45岁的同种异体移植物的患者(38例;73%)之间的Lysholm评分存在显著差异(分别为89.5±3.2和80.1±11.1;P = 0.0469)。多元回归模型显示供体年龄、最终随访和术前Lysholm评分是术后Lysholm评分的显著预测因素(P < 0.0002)。未照射的跟腱同种异体移植物的供体年龄影响了翻修ACL重建的中期结果,因此建议使用年轻供体的移植物。三级,回顾性比较研究。