Unit of Peri-Operative Geriatric Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Fight Aging and Stress, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, Unit es Mixtes de Recherche (UMR) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 8256 and Unit es Mixtes de Recherche (UMR) Institut National de la Sant é et de la Recherche M édicale (INSERM) 1166, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1151-1157. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15371. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
To compare the association between a restrictive transfusion strategy and cardiovascular complications during hospitalization for hip fracture with the association between a liberal transfusion strategy and cardiovascular complications, accounting for all transfusions from the emergency department to postacute rehabilitation settings.
Retrospective study.
Perioperative geriatric care unit.
All individuals aged 70 and older admitted to the emergency department for hip fracture and hospitalized in our perioperative geriatric care unit (N=667; n=193 in the liberal transfusion group, n=474 in the restrictive transfusion group) from July 2009 to April 2016.
A restrictive transfusion strategy (hemoglobin level threshold ≥8 g/dL or symptoms) used from January 2012 to April 2016 was compared with the liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin level threshold ≥10 g/dL) used from July 2009 to December 2011.
Primary endpoint was in-hospital acute cardiovascular complications (heart failure, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation or stroke).
The change to a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with fewer acute cardiovascular complications (odds ratio=0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.31-0.67, p<.001), without any noticeable difference in in-hospital or 6-month mortality. The change also led to a reduction in packed red blood cell units used per participant (median 1, interquartile range (IQR) 0-2 in restrictive vs median 2, IQR 0-3 in liberal transfusion strategy, P<.001). In rehabilitation settings, the frequency of transfusion was greater with the restrictive transfusion strategy than the liberal transfusion strategy (18% vs 9%, P<.001).
A restrictive transfusion strategy in older adults with hip fracture was found to be safe and was associated with fewer cardiovascular complications but more transfusions in rehabilitation settings. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
比较髋部骨折住院期间采用限制性输血策略与采用宽松性输血策略与心血管并发症的相关性,同时考虑从急诊科到康复后环境的所有输血。
回顾性研究。
围手术期老年护理病房。
2009 年 7 月至 2016 年 4 月期间,所有因髋部骨折到急诊科就诊并在我院围手术期老年护理病房住院的 70 岁及以上的个体(n=667;宽松性输血组 193 例,限制性输血组 474 例)。
从 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 4 月采用限制性输血策略(血红蛋白水平阈值≥8 g/dL 或有症状),与从 2009 年 7 月至 2011 年 12 月采用宽松性输血策略(血红蛋白水平阈值≥10 g/dL)进行比较。
主要终点为住院期间急性心血管并发症(心力衰竭、心肌梗死、心房颤动或中风)。
采用限制性输血策略与急性心血管并发症减少相关(比值比=0.45,95%置信区间(CI)=0.31-0.67,p<.001),且住院或 6 个月死亡率无明显差异。该改变还导致每位患者使用的红细胞单位减少(限制性输血策略中位数为 1,四分位距(IQR)0-2;宽松性输血策略中位数为 2,IQR 0-3,p<.001)。在康复环境中,限制性输血策略的输血频率高于宽松性输血策略(18%比 9%,p<.001)。
在髋部骨折的老年患者中,采用限制性输血策略是安全的,与心血管并发症减少相关,但在康复环境中更多输血。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。