Suppr超能文献

髋部骨折患者红细胞输注的限制性与宽松性策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhu Chao, Yin Jian, Wang Bin, Xue Qingmei, Gao Shan, Xing Linyu, Wang Hua, Liu Wei, Liu Xinhui

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics.

Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16795. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016795.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias.

RESULTS

We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient's condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient's specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.

摘要

背景

大多数临床指南推荐采用限制性红细胞(RBC)输血阈值。然而,髋部骨折患者的输血指征尚未得到明确评估或仍存在争议。我们比较了髋部骨折手术患者采用限制性与宽松输血策略的利弊。

方法

检索电子数据库以识别随机对照试验(RCT)和回顾性队列研究(RCS),以调查限制性策略与其宽松对应策略在髋部骨折手术患者中的效果。主要临床结局包括谵妄、死亡率、感染、心源性并发症、血栓栓塞事件、脑血管意外和住院时间。使用Cochrane协作网的荟萃分析程序(RevMan 5.3.0版)进行数据分析。通过Cochran卡方检验(Q检验)和I²检验评估统计异质性。使用Begg检验和Egger检验评估潜在的发表偏倚。

结果

我们识别出7项合格的RCT和2项合格的RCS,总共涉及3575例患者。在接受髋部骨折手术的患者中,我们发现RBC输血的限制性与宽松阈值之间在谵妄频率、死亡率、所有感染、肺炎、伤口感染、所有心血管事件、充血性心力衰竭、血栓栓塞事件或住院时间发生率方面无差异(P>0.05)。然而,我们发现采用限制性输血阈值与急性冠状动脉综合征发生率较高相关(P<0.05),而宽松输血阈值会增加脑血管意外风险(P<0.05)。

结论

在接受髋部骨折手术的患者中,临床医生应详细评估患者状况,并根据患者具体情况采用不同的输血策略,而不是仅仅采用某种输血策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a0/6708976/487eb5e4c5d3/medi-98-e16795-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验