Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1740-1746. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002213.
Among community-dwelling older adults, frailty is associated with heightened markers of inflammation and subsequent mortality. Although frailty is common among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, the role of frailty and markers of inflammation in this population remains unclear. We quantified these associations in patients on the kidney transplant waitlist and tested whether frailty and/or markers of inflammation improve waitlist mortality risk prediction.
We studied 1975 ESRD patients on the kidney transplant waitlist (November 1, 2009, to February 28, 2017) in a multi-center cohort study of frailty. Serum inflammatory markers (interleukin-6 [IL-6], soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptor-1 [sTNFR1], and C-reactive protein [CRP]) were analyzed in 605 of these participants; we calculated the inflammatory index score using IL-6 and sTNFR1. We compared the C-statistic of an established registry-based prediction model for waitlist mortality adding frailty and/or inflammatory markers (1 SD change in log IL-6, sTNFR1, CRP, or inflammatory index).
The registry-based model had moderate predictive ability (c-statistic = 0.655). Frailty was associated with increased mortality (2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.79) but did not improve risk prediction (c-statistic = 0.646; P = 0.65). Like frailty, IL-6 (2.13; 95% CI, 1.41-3.22), sTNFR1 (1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.59), CRP (1.68; 95% CI, 1.06-2.67), and the inflammatory index (2.09; 95% CI, 1.38-3.16) were associated with increased mortality risk; unlike frailty, adding IL-6 (c-statistic = 0.777; P = 0.02), CRP (c-statistic = 0.728; P = 0.02), or inflammatory index (c-statistic = 0.777; P = 0.02) substantially improved mortality risk prediction.
Frailty and markers of inflammation were associated with increased waitlist mortality risk, but only markers of inflammation significantly improved ESRD risk prediction. These findings help clarify the accelerated aging physiology of ESRD and highlight easy-to-measure markers of increased waitlist mortality risk.
在社区居住的老年人中,虚弱与炎症标志物升高和随后的死亡率增加有关。尽管虚弱在终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中很常见,但在该人群中,虚弱和炎症标志物的作用仍不清楚。我们在等待肾移植的患者中量化了这些关联,并测试了虚弱和/或炎症标志物是否可以改善等待移植患者的死亡风险预测。
我们在一项关于虚弱的多中心队列研究中研究了 1975 名在等待肾移植的 ESRD 患者(2009 年 11 月 1 日至 2017 年 2 月 28 日)。在这些参与者中,有 605 人分析了血清炎症标志物(白细胞介素 6 [IL-6]、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子-α受体 1 [sTNFR1]和 C 反应蛋白 [CRP]);我们使用 IL-6 和 sTNFR1 计算了炎症指数评分。我们比较了在添加虚弱和/或炎症标志物(IL-6、sTNFR1、CRP 或炎症指数的 1 个标准差变化)后,基于登记的等待移植患者死亡率预测模型的 C 统计量。
基于登记的模型具有中等预测能力(C 统计量=0.655)。虚弱与死亡率增加相关(2.19;95%置信区间[CI],1.26-3.79),但不能改善风险预测(C 统计量=0.646;P=0.65)。与虚弱一样,IL-6(2.13;95%CI,1.41-3.22)、sTNFR1(1.70;95%CI,1.12-2.59)、CRP(1.68;95%CI,1.06-2.67)和炎症指数(2.09;95%CI,1.38-3.16)与死亡率增加相关;与虚弱不同的是,添加 IL-6(C 统计量=0.777;P=0.02)、CRP(C 统计量=0.728;P=0.02)或炎症指数(C 统计量=0.777;P=0.02)显著改善了死亡率风险预测。
虚弱和炎症标志物与等待移植患者的死亡率增加相关,但只有炎症标志物能显著改善 ESRD 风险预测。这些发现有助于阐明 ESRD 的加速衰老生理学,并强调了易于测量的等待移植患者死亡率增加的标志物。