• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于注意力的知觉学习不会影响对意识的通达。

Attention-based perceptual learning does not affect access to awareness.

作者信息

Paffen Chris L E, Gayet Surya, Heilbron Micha, Van der Stigchel Stefan

机构信息

Experimental Psychology & Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vis. 2018 Mar 1;18(3):7. doi: 10.1167/18.3.7.

DOI:10.1167/18.3.7
PMID:29677322
Abstract

Visual information that is relevant for an observer gains prioritized access to awareness (Gayet, Van der Stigchel, & Paffen, 2014). Here we investigate whether information that was relevant for an extended duration is prioritized for access to awareness when it is no longer relevant. We applied a perceptual-learning paradigm, in which observers were trained for 3 days on a speed-discrimination task. This task used a stimulus consisting of two motion directions, of which one was relevant to the task and one irrelevant. Before and after training, we applied a motion-coherence task to validate whether perceptual learning took place, and a breaking continuous flash-suppression (b-CFS) paradigm to assess how training affected access to awareness. The results reveal that motion-coherence thresholds for the task-relevant motion direction selectively decreased after compared to before training, revealing that task-relevant perceptual learning took place. The results of the b-CFS task, however, reveal that access to awareness was not affected by task-relevant learning: Instead, detection times for motion undergoing CFS decreased, irrespective of its direction, after compared to before training. A follow-up experiment showed that the time to detect visual motion also decreased after 3 days without training, revealing that perceptual learning did not cause the general decrease in detection times. The latter is in line with results by Mastropasqua, Tse, and Turatto (2015) and has important consequences for studies applying b-CFS to assess access to awareness: Studies that intend to apply measurements involving b-CFS on different testing days should consider that breakthrough times will dramatically decrease from pre- to postmeasurement.

摘要

与观察者相关的视觉信息能够优先进入意识(盖耶、范德施蒂歇尔和帕芬,2014年)。在此,我们研究当持续一段时间相关的信息不再相关时,其进入意识的过程是否仍被优先对待。我们采用了一种知觉学习范式,让观察者在速度辨别任务上进行为期3天的训练。该任务使用的刺激由两个运动方向组成,其中一个与任务相关,另一个无关。在训练前后,我们运用运动连贯性任务来验证是否发生了知觉学习,并采用打破连续闪烁抑制(b-CFS)范式来评估训练如何影响意识的进入。结果显示,与训练前相比,任务相关运动方向的运动连贯性阈值有选择性地降低,这表明发生了与任务相关的知觉学习。然而,b-CFS任务的结果显示,意识的进入不受与任务相关学习的影响:相反,与训练前相比,经历CFS的运动的检测时间缩短了,无论其方向如何。一项后续实验表明,在未经训练的3天后,检测视觉运动的时间也缩短了,这表明知觉学习并非导致检测时间普遍缩短的原因。后者与马斯托帕斯卡、谢和图拉托(2015年)的结果一致,这对于应用b-CFS来评估意识进入的研究具有重要意义:那些打算在不同测试日应用涉及b-CFS测量的研究应考虑到,从测量前到测量后,突破时间将大幅缩短。

相似文献

1
Attention-based perceptual learning does not affect access to awareness.基于注意力的知觉学习不会影响对意识的通达。
J Vis. 2018 Mar 1;18(3):7. doi: 10.1167/18.3.7.
2
Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features.基于注意力的知觉学习增强了对无关视觉特征的双眼竞争抑制。
J Vis. 2008 Apr 24;8(4):25.1-11. doi: 10.1167/8.4.25.
3
Learning to filter out visual distractors.学习过滤视觉干扰因素。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Apr;29(8):1723-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06724.x.
4
Perceptual learning of motion direction discrimination transfers to an opposite direction with TPE training.通过TPE训练,运动方向辨别方面的知觉学习可转移至相反方向。
Vision Res. 2014 Jun;99:93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Motion perceptual learning: when only task-relevant information is learned.运动知觉学习:当仅学习与任务相关的信息时。
J Vis. 2007 Jul 27;7(10):14.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.10.14.
6
Motion direction discrimination training reduces perceived motion repulsion.运动方向辨别训练可减少感知到的运动排斥。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):878-887. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1261-x.
7
Task-dependent changes of the psychophysical motion-tuning functions in the course of perceptual learning.知觉学习过程中心理物理学运动调谐功能的任务依赖性变化。
Perception. 2004;33(9):1139-47. doi: 10.1068/p5195.
8
Capture of attention to threatening stimuli without perceptual awareness.在没有知觉意识的情况下对威胁性刺激的注意力捕获。
Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 14;19(13):1118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
9
When attention interrupts learning: inhibitory effects of attention on TIPL.当注意力干扰学习时:注意力对线索整合加工学习(TIPL)的抑制作用
Vision Res. 2009 Oct;49(21):2586-90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
10
Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors.与任务刺激的空间距离对静态Gabors任务无关的知觉学习的影响。
J Vis. 2007 Oct 12;7(13):2.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.13.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaze direction and face orientation modulate perceptual sensitivity to faces under interocular suppression.注视方向和面部朝向调节了双眼抑制下对面孔感知敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11717-4.
2
Stimulus variability and task relevance modulate binding-learning.刺激变异性和任务相关性调节绑定学习。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1151-1166. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02338-6. Epub 2021 Jul 19.