University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland.
University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland.
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;84:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
Temperament and character profiles have been associated with depression outcome and alcohol abuse comorbidity in depressed patients. How harmful alcohol use modifies the effects of temperament and character on depression outcome is not well known. Knowledge of these associations could provide a method for enhancing more individualized treatment strategies for these patients.
We screened 242 depressed patients with at least moderate level of depressive symptoms. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used for identifying patients with marked alcohol use problems (AUP, AUDIT≥11). After 6 weeks of antidepressive treatment 173 patients were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-R). Outcome of depression (MADRS scores across three follow-up points at 6 weeks, 6 months and 24 months) was predicted with AUP, gender, and AUP x Gender and AUP x Time interactions together with temperament and character dimension scores in a linear mixed effects model.
Poorer outcome of depression (MADRS scores at 6 weeks, 6 months and 24 months) was predicted by AUP × Time interaction (p = 0.0002) together with low Reward Dependence (p = 0.003). Gender and all other temperament and character traits were non-significant predictors of the depression outcome in the mixed effects model.
Possibly due to the modifying effect of alcohol use problems, high Reward Dependence was associated with better depression treatment outcome at 6 months. Harm Avoidance and Self-Directedness did not predict depression outcome when alcohol use problems were controlled.
气质和性格特征与抑郁患者的抑郁结局和酒精滥用共病有关。目前尚不清楚有害的酒精使用如何改变气质和性格对抑郁结局的影响。了解这些关联可以为这些患者提供增强更个体化治疗策略的方法。
我们对 242 名至少有中度抑郁症状的抑郁患者进行了筛查。使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)来识别有明显酒精使用问题的患者(AUP,AUDIT≥11)。在抗抑郁治疗 6 周后,173 名患者使用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和气质与性格量表(TCI-R)进行评估。使用线性混合效应模型,使用 AUP、性别以及 AUP×性别和 AUP×时间相互作用,以及气质和性格维度得分,预测抑郁结局(MADRS 评分在 6 周、6 个月和 24 个月的三个随访点)。
较差的抑郁结局(MADRS 评分在 6 周、6 个月和 24 个月)与 AUP×时间相互作用(p=0.0002)以及低奖赏依赖(p=0.003)相关。性别和其他所有气质和性格特征在混合效应模型中均不是抑郁结局的显著预测因素。
可能由于酒精使用问题的修饰作用,高奖赏依赖与 6 个月时更好的抑郁治疗结局相关。当控制酒精使用问题时,回避和自我导向并不预测抑郁结局。