Boer Barbara C, Hoogeslag Roy A G, Brouwer Reinoud W, Demmer Anna, Huis In 't Veld Rianne M H A
OCON Centre for Orthopaedic Surgery, Knee Unit, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 20;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is today's surgical gold standard for ACL rupture. Although it provides satisfactory results, not all patients return to their previous activity level and moreover, early posttraumatic osteoarthritis is not prevented. As such, a renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation. Compared to ACL reconstruction, the hypothesized advantages of ACL suture repair are earlier return to sports, reduction of early posttraumatic osteoarthritis and preservation of the patient's native ACL tissue and proprioceptive envelope of the knee. In recent literature, ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation tends to be at least equally effective compared to ACL reconstruction, but no randomized comparative study has yet been conducted.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective, stratified, block randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight patients with an ACL rupture will be assigned to either a suture repair group with dynamic augmentation and microfracture of the femoral notch, or an ACL reconstruction group with autologous semitendinosis graft and all-inside technique. The primary objective is to investigate the hypothesis that suture repair of a ruptured ACL results in at least equal effectiveness compared with an ACL reconstruction in terms of patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000 subjective scale) 1 year postoperatively. Secondary objectives are to evaluate patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000, KOOS, Tegner, VAS), re-rupture rate, rehabilitation time required for return to daily and sports activities, achieved levels of sports activity, clinimetrics (Rolimeter, LSI, Isoforce) and development of osteoarthritis, at short term (6 weeks, 3, 6 and 9 months and 1 year), midterm (2 and 5 years) and long term (10 years) postoperatively.
A renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation in the treatment of ACL rupture. Recent cohort studies show good short- and midterm results for this technique. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the outcome of suture repair of a ruptured ACL, combined with DIS as well as microfracture of the femoral notch, with ACL reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus.
Clinical Trials Register NCT02310854 (retrospectively registered on December 1st, 2014).
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是目前ACL断裂的外科金标准。尽管其效果令人满意,但并非所有患者都能恢复到先前的活动水平,而且也无法预防创伤后早期骨关节炎。因此,ACL缝合修复联合动态增强技术重新引起了人们的关注。与ACL重建相比,ACL缝合修复的假定优势在于能更早恢复运动、减少创伤后早期骨关节炎的发生,并保留患者自身的ACL组织和膝关节的本体感觉结构。在最近的文献中,ACL缝合修复联合动态增强技术与ACL重建相比似乎至少同样有效,但尚未进行随机对照研究。
方法/设计:本研究是一项前瞻性、分层、区组随机对照试验。48例ACL断裂患者将被分配至动态增强联合股骨切迹微骨折的缝合修复组,或自体半腱肌移植物和全内置技术的ACL重建组。主要目的是研究以下假设:ACL断裂的缝合修复在术后1年患者自我报告的结果(IKDC 2000主观量表)方面与ACL重建至少具有同等疗效。次要目的是评估患者自我报告的结果(IKDC 2000、KOOS、Tegner、VAS)、再断裂率、恢复日常和体育活动所需的康复时间、达到的体育活动水平、临床测量指标(旋转计、LSI、等动肌力测试仪)以及术后短期(6周、3、6和9个月及1年)、中期(2年和5年)和长期(10年)骨关节炎的发展情况。
ACL缝合修复联合动态增强技术在ACL断裂治疗中重新引起了人们的关注。最近的队列研究显示该技术具有良好的短期和中期效果。本随机对照试验旨在比较ACL断裂的缝合修复联合DIS以及股骨切迹微骨折与自体半腱肌ACL重建的结果。
临床试验注册编号NCT02310854(于2014年12月1日追溯注册)。