Suppr超能文献

一项低强度、广泛包容的急诊护理协调干预对与初级保健的衔接和急诊利用的影响。

Impact of a low intensity and broadly inclusive ED care coordination intervention on linkage to primary care and ED utilization.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2219-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a broadly inclusive, comparatively low intensity intervention linking ED patients to a primary care home.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated ED patients referred for primary care linkage in a large, urban, academic ED. A care coordination specialist performed a brief interview to gauge access barriers and provide a clinic referral with optional scheduling assistance. Data were abstracted from program records and the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the proportion of referred individuals who attended at least one primary care appointment. Secondary outcomes included return ED encounters within one year, and factors associated with linkage outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 2142 referrals made for 2064 patients; 1688/2142 accepted assistance. Linkage was successful for 1059/1688 (63%, CI95 60% to 65%). Among patients accepting assistance, those without successful linkage were younger (41 vs 45years, difference 3years, CI95 2 to 3), more often male (62% vs 55%,difference 7%, CI95 2% to 12%), and less likely to have a chronic medical condition (37% vs 45%, difference 8%; CI95 3% to 12%) or to have had an appointment scheduled within two weeks (26% vs 33%, difference 7%, CI95 2% to 12%). Insurance status and self-reported barriers to care were not associated with linkage success. Patterns of subsequent ED use were similar, regardless of referral status or linkage outcome.

CONCLUSION

Low intensity, broadly inclusive, ED care coordination linked nearly 50% of patients referred for intervention, and two-thirds of willing participants, with a primary care home.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估一种广泛包容、相对低强度的干预措施的有效性,该措施将急诊患者与初级保健机构联系起来。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究评估了在一家大型城市学术急诊室中因初级保健转介而接受评估的急诊患者。一名护理协调专家进行了简短的访谈,以评估就诊障碍并提供诊所转介,可选择提供预约协助。数据从项目记录和电子病历中提取。主要结果是接受转介的患者中至少有一人参加了至少一次初级保健预约的比例。次要结果包括一年内返回急诊的次数,以及与转介结果相关的因素。

结果

共转介 2142 人,涉及 2064 名患者;1688/2142 人接受了帮助。在 1688 名接受帮助的患者中,有 1059/1688 人(63%,95%CI95 为 60%至 65%)成功转介。在未成功转介的患者中,年龄更小(41 岁 vs 45 岁,差异 3 岁,95%CI95 为 2 至 3 岁),男性比例更高(62% vs 55%,差异 7%,95%CI95 为 2%至 12%),患有慢性疾病的可能性更小(37% vs 45%,差异 8%,95%CI95 为 3%至 12%),并且在两周内预约的可能性更小(26% vs 33%,差异 7%,95%CI95 为 2%至 12%)。保险状况和自我报告的就诊障碍与转介成功无关。无论转介状态或转介结果如何,随后的急诊就诊模式相似。

结论

低强度、广泛包容的急诊护理协调将近 50%的接受干预转介的患者与初级保健机构联系起来,并且有三分之二的意愿参与者成功转介。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验