Masood Maheer M, Huang Benjamin, Goins Allie, Hackman Trevor G
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Jul-Aug;39(4):413-417. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Ultrasonography is a well-established modality for visualization of head and neck anatomy. Using ultrasound to detect vocal fold mobility has been described before, but no study has evaluated factors affecting the exam reliability. The aim of the study is to determine anatomic factors influencing the reliability of ultrasound to detect vocal fold motion. Methods and materials Patients underwent ultrasound evaluation and flexible laryngoscopy to assess vocal fold motion from August 2015 to March 2016. Length, accuracy, and clarity of ultrasound examination were assessed, compared to flexible laryngoscopy. For patients with prior neck CT scan imaging, laryngeal anatomy was independently assessed by a blinded neuroradiologist.
A total of 23 patients, 21 with bilateral vocal fold motion and two with unilateral paralysis, were enrolled. Vocal folds were visible in 19 patients (82%). Eight patients (42%) had good/excellent view and 11 patients (58%) had fair/difficult view. The ultrasound correctly detected absent movement of the vocal fold in the two patients with unilateral paralysis. A total of 19 patients had CT scans, and a linear correlation (r = 0.65) was noted between the anterior thyroid cartilage angle measured on CT and the grade of view on ultrasound.
Ultrasound was able to detect vocal fold motion in 82% of randomly screened patients. Ease of detection of vocal fold motion correlated with the anterior thyroid angle. Further studies are warranted to investigate the reproducibility of our results and how this might impact use of ultrasound for detection of vocal fold motion in the operative setting.
超声检查是一种用于可视化头颈部解剖结构的成熟方法。此前已有关于使用超声检测声带活动度的描述,但尚无研究评估影响该检查可靠性的因素。本研究的目的是确定影响超声检测声带运动可靠性的解剖学因素。方法和材料:2015年8月至2016年3月期间,患者接受了超声评估和纤维喉镜检查以评估声带运动。将超声检查的长度、准确性和清晰度与纤维喉镜检查进行比较。对于有颈部CT扫描成像的患者,由一位不知情的神经放射科医生独立评估喉部解剖结构。
共纳入23例患者,其中21例双侧声带运动正常,2例单侧麻痹。19例患者(82%)可见声带。8例患者(42%)视野良好/极佳,11例患者(58%)视野一般/困难。超声正确检测出2例单侧麻痹患者声带无运动。共有19例患者进行了CT扫描,CT测量的甲状软骨前角与超声视野分级之间存在线性相关性(r = 0.65)。
超声能够在82%的随机筛查患者中检测到声带运动。声带运动的检测难易程度与甲状软骨前角相关。有必要进一步研究以探讨我们结果的可重复性以及这可能如何影响在手术环境中使用超声检测声带运动。