School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.
Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;635:607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.152. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
Urine patches and dung pats from grazing livestock create hotspots for production and emission of the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (NO), and represent a large proportion of total NO emissions in many national agricultural greenhouse gas inventories. As such, there is much interest in developing country specific NO emission factors (EFs) for excretal nitrogen (EF pasture, range and paddock) deposited during gazing. The aims of this study were to generate separate NO emissions data for cattle derived urine and dung, to provide an evidence base for the generation of a country specific EF for the UK from this nitrogen source. The experiments were also designed to determine the effects of site and timing of application on emissions, and the efficacy of the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) on NO losses. This co-ordinated set of 15 plot-scale, year-long field experiments using static chambers was conducted at five grassland sites, typical of the soil and climatic zones of grazed grassland in the UK. We show that the average urine and dung NO EFs were 0.69% and 0.19%, respectively, resulting in a combined excretal NO EF (EF), of 0.49%, which is <25% of the IPCC default EF for excretal returns from grazing cattle. Regression analysis suggests that urine NO EFs were controlled more by composition than was the case for dung, whilst dung NO EFs were more related to soil and environmental factors. The urine NO EF was significantly greater from the site in SW England, and significantly greater from the early grazing season urine application than later applications. Dycandiamide reduced the NO EF from urine patches by an average of 46%. The significantly lower excretal EF than the IPCC default has implications for the UK's national inventory and for subsequent carbon footprinting of UK ruminant livestock products.
尿液斑和放牧牲畜的粪便垫是产生和排放温室气体一氧化二氮(NO)的热点,在许多国家农业温室气体清单中,它们代表了总 NO 排放的很大一部分。因此,人们非常有兴趣为放牧期间排泄的氮(牧场、牧场和围场的 EF 粪便)开发特定国家的 NO 排放因子(EF)。本研究的目的是为牛的尿液和粪便分别生成单独的 NO 排放数据,为从该氮源生成英国特定国家的 EF 提供证据基础。这些实验还旨在确定应用地点和时间对排放的影响,以及硝化抑制剂双氰胺(DCD)对 NO 损失的效果。这项协调的 15 个地块规模、为期一年的现场实验使用静态室在五个草地地点进行,这些地点代表了英国放牧草地的土壤和气候带。我们表明,尿液和粪便的平均 NO EF 分别为 0.69%和 0.19%,导致排泄的综合 NO EF(EF)为 0.49%,<25%为 IPCC 默认放牧牛排泄返回的 EF。回归分析表明,尿液 NO EF 受组成的控制程度大于粪便,而粪便 NO EF 与土壤和环境因素的关系更为密切。来自英格兰西南部的站点的尿液 NO EF 显著更高,并且早期放牧季节尿液应用的 NO EF 显著高于后期应用。双氰胺平均减少尿液斑的 NO EF 46%。排泄 EF 明显低于 IPCC 默认值,这对英国国家清单以及随后对英国反刍动物牲畜产品的碳足迹计算有影响。