Evidera, London, UK.
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):394-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
The potential for multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support health technology assessment (HTA) has been much discussed, and various HTA agencies are piloting or applying MCDA. Alongside these developments, good practice guidelines for the application of MCDA in health care have been developed. An assessment of current applications of MCDA to HTA in light of good practice guidelines reveals, however, that many have methodologic flaws that undermine their usefulness. Three challenges are considered: the use of additive models, a lack of connection between criteria scales and weights, and the use of MCDA in economic evaluation. More attention needs to be paid to MCDA good practice by researchers, journal editors, and decision makers and further methodologic developments are required if MCDA is to achieve its potential to support HTA.
多准则决策分析(MCDA)在支持健康技术评估(HTA)方面的潜力已经被广泛讨论,并且各种 HTA 机构正在试用或应用 MCDA。随着这些发展,用于医疗保健中 MCDA 应用的良好实践指南已经制定。然而,根据良好实践指南,对当前 MCDA 在 HTA 中的应用进行评估后发现,许多应用都存在方法学缺陷,从而削弱了它们的有用性。考虑了三个挑战:加性模型的使用、标准尺度与权重之间缺乏联系以及在经济评估中使用 MCDA。研究人员、期刊编辑和决策者需要更加关注 MCDA 的良好实践,并且需要进一步发展方法学,如果 MCDA 要实现支持 HTA 的潜力,就需要如此。