• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——新兴良好实践:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告2

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

作者信息

Marsh Kevin, IJzerman Maarten, Thokala Praveen, Baltussen Rob, Boysen Meindert, Kaló Zoltán, Lönngren Thomas, Mussen Filip, Peacock Stuart, Watkins John, Devlin Nancy

机构信息

Evidera, London, UK.

Department of Health Technology & Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016
PMID:27021745
Abstract

Health care decisions are complex and involve confronting trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting objectives. Using structured, explicit approaches to decisions involving multiple criteria can improve the quality of decision making. A set of techniques, known under the collective heading, multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA), are useful for this purpose. In 2014, ISPOR established an Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The task force's first report defined MCDA, provided examples of its use in health care, described the key steps, and provided an overview of the principal methods of MCDA. This second task force report provides emerging good-practice guidance on the implementation of MCDA to support health care decisions. The report includes: a checklist to support the design, implementation and review of an MCDA; guidance to support the implementation of the checklist; the order in which the steps should be implemented; illustrates how to incorporate budget constraints into an MCDA; provides an overview of the skills and resources, including available software, required to implement MCDA; and future research directions.

摘要

医疗保健决策十分复杂,需要在多个往往相互冲突的目标之间进行权衡。采用结构化、明确的方法来处理涉及多个标准的决策,能够提高决策质量。一组统称为多标准决策分析(MCDA)的技术可用于此目的。2014年,药物经济学与结果研究国际协会(ISPOR)成立了一个新兴良好实践特别工作组。该特别工作组的第一份报告对MCDA进行了定义,列举了其在医疗保健领域的应用实例,描述了关键步骤,并概述了MCDA的主要方法。这份特别工作组的第二份报告提供了关于实施MCDA以支持医疗保健决策的新兴良好实践指南。该报告包括:一份支持MCDA设计、实施和审查的清单;支持清单实施的指南;步骤实施的顺序;说明如何将预算限制纳入MCDA;概述实施MCDA所需的技能和资源,包括可用软件;以及未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——新兴良好实践:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告2
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
2
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Challenges in Using MCDA for Reimbursement Decisions on New Medicines?在使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)进行新药报销决策时面临的挑战?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):123-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
4
Value of Information Analysis for Research Decisions-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force.信息价值分析在研究决策中的应用:ISPOR 信息价值分析新兴良好实践工作组报告 1。
Value Health. 2020 Feb;23(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.001.
5
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.预算影响分析——良好实践原则:ISPOR 2012 预算影响分析良好实践 II 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
7
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.预算影响分析良好实践原则:ISPOR良好研究实践特别工作组——预算影响分析报告
Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x.
8
Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment.健康技术评估的多准则决策分析。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1172-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
9
The Use of MCDA in HTA: Great Potential, but More Effort Needed.多准则决策分析在卫生技术评估中的应用:潜力巨大,但仍需努力。
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):394-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Application of Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research: Report 2 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force.约束优化方法在卫生服务研究中的应用:ISPOR 优化方法新兴良好实践工作组报告 2。
Value Health. 2018 Sep;21(9):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Pill: Mapping Process-Oriented Decision Support Models in Pharmaceutical Policy.超越避孕药:绘制药物政策中面向过程的决策支持模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1861. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151861.
2
Health Benefit Package Revision Is an Art as Much as a Science - Lessons Learned on the Organization of the Appraisal Phase.健康福利套餐修订既是一门科学,也是一门艺术——评估阶段组织工作的经验教训。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8819. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8819. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Evaluation of the social and economic impact of extreme weather events in people living with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (S3E project): Protocol for a mixed-method study.
南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省艾滋病毒感染者极端天气事件的社会和经济影响评估(S3E项目):一项混合方法研究的方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0325490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325490. eCollection 2025.
4
Use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision-making during health emergencies: a scoping review.使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)支持卫生紧急情况期间的决策:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1584026. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584026. eCollection 2025.
5
A value framework for lymphoma therapies based on MACBETH method.基于MACBETH方法的淋巴瘤治疗价值框架
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 May 19;41(1):e49. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000169.
6
How well do participants understand the questions asked in the Online Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach? A cognitive debrief of the EQ-HWB-S (EQ Health and Wellbeing Short version) valuation.参与者对在线个人效用函数(OPUF)方法中所提问题的理解程度如何?对EQ-HWB-S(EQ健康与幸福简版)估值的认知情况汇报。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03989-w.
7
Research priorities to support typhoid conjugate vaccine decision-making in India: evidence assessment and stakeholder survey.支持印度伤寒结合疫苗决策的研究重点:证据评估与利益相关者调查
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Oct 3;2(2):e001089. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001089. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Value contribution of leniolisib in the Treatment of Activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS) in Spain using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)评估来那利西布在西班牙治疗活化磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶δ综合征(APDS)中的价值贡献。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jan 27;12:9-15. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3199. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.迈向个性化干预建议:一项关于乳腺癌相关疲劳患者偏好异质性的调查研究
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):23814683241309676. doi: 10.1177/23814683241309676. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
10
Medically assisted integrated rehabilitation program for people with opioid dependence: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multi-criteria decision analysis.针对阿片类药物依赖者的医疗辅助综合康复项目:一项使用多标准决策分析的准实验评估
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06416-5.