• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经心内注射氯化钾实施杀胎与未实施杀胎情况下扩张刮除术的结局:一项服务评估

Outcomes of dilation and evacuation with and without feticide by intra-cardiac potassium chloride injection: a service evaluation.

作者信息

Lohr Patricia A, Parsons John H, Taylor Jeanette, Morroni Chelsea

机构信息

British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 Apr 19. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.010
PMID:29680767
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare procedure duration, complications, and acceptability of dilation and evacuation (D&E) with and without feticide by intra-cardiac potassium chloride (KCL) injection.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated outcomes with D&E at 18-24 weeks of gestation in the 6 months before and 6 months after removing feticide with KCL from the guidelines of a national British abortion provider. We extracted demographic and procedure-related data from medical records and electronic databases. We surveyed women undergoing D&E in both time periods about acceptability and side effects.

RESULTS

We analyzed 291 cases with and 257 cases without KCL. Unadjusted mean procedure duration was shorter with KCL than without (12.7 vs. 16.1 min, respectively, p<.001). After adjustment for age, parity, Cesarean deliveries, gestational age, body mass index, surgeon, and number or duration of osmotic dilators used, KCL remained associated with a 3.5 min (95% CI 2.4-4.6) reduction in D&E duration. Uterine atony was more common with KCL than without (3% vs. 0%, respectively, p=.004), despite more frequent administration of prophylactic utero-tonics to women who received KCL (82% KCL vs. 73% no-KCL, p=.001). Women who had KCL reported more pain in the period between feticide and dilator placement and the evacuation than women who had not received feticide (49% vs. 25%, respectively, p<.001). Most women in both groups found their procedure very acceptable or acceptable (79% KCL vs. 87% no-KCL, p=.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Feticide with intra-cardiac KCL reduced D&E procedure duration, but was associated with more pain and uterine atony. Treatment acceptability was high with and without feticide.

IMPLICATIONS

Inducing fetal demise before dilation and evacuation with intra-cardiac potassium chloride may result in shorter operative times but does not appear to improve safety or acceptability. Level I evidence remains needed to support the use of feticide before surgical abortion.

摘要

目的

比较采用心内注射氯化钾(KCL)实施或未实施胎儿安乐死情况下扩张刮宫术(D&E)的手术时长、并发症及可接受性。

研究设计

我们评估了英国一家全国性堕胎服务机构在从指南中去除KCL胎儿安乐死方法之前6个月及之后6个月内,妊娠18 - 24周时进行D&E的结果。我们从病历和电子数据库中提取了人口统计学及与手术相关的数据。我们对两个时间段接受D&E的女性进行了关于可接受性和副作用的调查。

结果

我们分析了291例使用KCL的病例和257例未使用KCL的病例。未调整的平均手术时长,使用KCL的短于未使用的(分别为12.7分钟和16.1分钟,p<0.001)。在对年龄、产次、剖宫产史、孕周、体重指数、外科医生以及使用的渗透扩张器数量或时长进行调整后,KCL仍与D&E时长缩短3.5分钟(95%可信区间2.4 - 4.6)相关。使用KCL时子宫收缩乏力比未使用时更常见(分别为3%和0%,p = 0.004),尽管接受KCL的女性预防性使用宫缩剂的频率更高(使用KCL的为82%,未使用KCL的为73%,p = 0.001)。与未接受胎儿安乐死的女性相比,接受KCL的女性在胎儿安乐死至放置扩张器及刮宫期间报告的疼痛更多(分别为49%和25%,p<0.001)。两组中的大多数女性都认为她们的手术非常可接受或可接受(使用KCL的为79%,未使用KCL的为87%,p = 0.2)。

结论

心内注射KCL进行胎儿安乐死可缩短D&E手术时长,但与更多疼痛和子宫收缩乏力相关。有无胎儿安乐死时治疗的可接受性都很高。

启示

在扩张刮宫术前用心内注射氯化钾诱导胎儿死亡可能会缩短手术时间,但似乎并未提高安全性或可接受性。仍需要一级证据来支持在手术流产前使用胎儿安乐死。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of dilation and evacuation with and without feticide by intra-cardiac potassium chloride injection: a service evaluation.经心内注射氯化钾实施杀胎与未实施杀胎情况下扩张刮除术的结局:一项服务评估
Contraception. 2018 Apr 19. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.010.
2
Drugs used to induce fetal demise prior to abortion: a systematic review.堕胎前用于导致胎儿死亡的药物:一项系统评价
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 9;2:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100046. eCollection 2020.
3
A new and more effective feticide technique in late termination of pregnancy: potassium chloride injection into the interventricular septum of the fetal heart.一种用于晚期妊娠终止的新型且更有效的胎儿致死技术:向胎儿心脏室间隔注射氯化钾。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):779-787. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06795-8. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Fetal intracardiac potassium chloride injection to expedite second-trimester dilation and evacuation.胎儿心内氯化钾注射加速中期扩张和排空。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(1):63-8. doi: 10.1159/000333815. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Funic potassium chloride injection during intact dilation and evacuation.芬那氯铵钾注射液在完整扩张和排空期间使用。
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):275-277. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation.孕中期扩张刮宫术的宫颈准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4(8):CD007310. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007310.pub2.
7
Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture.经皮脐血穿刺术与心脏穿刺术实施胎儿减灭术的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;20(3):230-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00797.x.
8
Effectiveness of intra-cardiac lidocaine and intra-amniotic digoxin at inducing fetal demise before second trimester abortion past 20 weeks at a tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A retrospective review.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院中,心内注射利多卡因和羊膜腔内注射地高辛在妊娠20周后中期妊娠流产前诱导胎儿死亡的有效性:一项回顾性研究。
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 31;4:100082. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100082. eCollection 2022.
9
Late termination of pregnancy by intracardiac potassium chloride injection: 5 years' experience at a tertiary referral centre.经心内氯化钾注射终止妊娠:三级转诊中心 5 年经验。
S Afr Med J. 2012 Oct 25;103(1):47-51. doi: 10.7196/samj.6006.
10
Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial.甘丙肽在渗透扩张器插入后和扩张及排空前用于疼痛管理:一项随机对照试验。
Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Drugs used to induce fetal demise prior to abortion: a systematic review.堕胎前用于导致胎儿死亡的药物:一项系统评价
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 9;2:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100046. eCollection 2020.