a Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine , University of Almeria (UAL) , Almeria , Spain.
b Department of Physical Therapy , Andalusian Health Service, Primary Health Physical Therapy , Almeria , Spain.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2235-2246. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1461259. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
To compare the effectiveness of dry needling versus myofascial release on myofascial trigger points pain in cervical muscles, quality of life, impact of symptoms pain, quality of sleep, anxiety, depression, and fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-four subjects with fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to a dry needling group or a myofascial release group. Pain pressure thresholds of myofascial trigger points were evaluated in the cervical muscles. In addition, quality of life, impact of fibromyalgia symptoms, quality of sleep, intensity of pain, anxiety and depression symptoms, impact of fatigue at baseline and post treatment after four weeks of intervention were evaluated. Significant improvement was found in most pain pressure thresholds of the myofascial trigger points in cervical muscles in the dry needling group compared to myofascial release ( < 0.05). Similarly, these differences between groups were found for the components of quality of life of physical function ( = 12.74, = 0.001), physical role ( = 11.24, = 0.001), body pain ( =30.26, < 0.001), general health ( = 15.83, < 0.001), vitality ( = 13.51, = 0.001), social function ( = 4.73, = 0.034), emotional role ( = 8.01, = 0.006), and mental health ( = 4.95, = 0.030). Similar results were achieved for total impact of FMS symptoms ( = 42.91, < 0.001), quality of sleep ( = 11.96, = 0.001), state anxiety ( = 7.40, = 0.009), and trait anxiety ( = -14.63, < 0.001), hospital anxiety and depression ( = 20.60, < 0.001), general pain intensity ( = 29.59, < 0.001), and fatigue ( = -25.73, < 0.001). The dry needling therapy showed higher improvements in comparison with myofascial release therapy for pain pressure thresholds, the components of quality of life of physical role, body pain, vitality and social function, as well as the total impact of FMS symptoms, quality of sleep, state and trait anxiety, hospital anxiety-depression, general pain intensity and fatigue. Implications for rehabilitation Dry needling therapy reduces myofascial trigger point pain in the short term in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. This therapeutic approach improves anxiety, depression, fatigue symptoms, quality of life, and sleep after treatment. Dry needling and myofascial release therapies decrease intensity of pain, and the impact of fibromyalgia symptoms in this population. These intervention approaches should be considered in an independent manner as complementary therapies within a multidisciplinary setting.
比较干针与肌筋膜松解治疗颈肌肌筋膜触发点疼痛、生活质量、纤维肌痛综合征症状影响、睡眠质量、焦虑、抑郁和疲劳的疗效。一项单盲随机对照试验。64 例纤维肌痛患者随机分为干针组或肌筋膜松解组。评估颈肌肌筋膜触发点的疼痛压力阈值。此外,在基线和治疗后 4 周评估生活质量、纤维肌痛症状影响、睡眠质量、疼痛强度、焦虑和抑郁症状、疲劳影响。与肌筋膜松解相比,干针组颈肌肌筋膜触发点的大多数疼痛压力阈值均显著改善( < 0.05)。同样,在身体功能( = 12.74, = 0.001)、身体角色( = 11.24, = 0.001)、身体疼痛( = 30.26, < 0.001)、一般健康( = 15.83, < 0.001)、活力( = 13.51, = 0.001)、社会功能( = 4.73, = 0.034)、情绪角色( = 8.01, = 0.006)和心理健康( = 4.95, = 0.030)方面,组间也存在这些差异。纤维肌痛综合征总影响( = 42.91, < 0.001)、睡眠质量( = 11.96, = 0.001)、状态焦虑( = 7.40, = 0.009)和特质焦虑( = -14.63, < 0.001)、医院焦虑抑郁( = 20.60, < 0.001)、一般疼痛强度( = 29.59, < 0.001)和疲劳( = -25.73, < 0.001)方面,干针治疗也显示出更高的改善。与肌筋膜松解治疗相比,干针治疗在改善身体角色、身体疼痛、活力和社会功能的生活质量方面,以及纤维肌痛综合征症状总影响、睡眠质量、状态和特质焦虑、医院焦虑抑郁、一般疼痛强度和疲劳方面,疼痛压力阈值改善更高。康复意义干针治疗可在短期内减轻纤维肌痛综合征患者的肌筋膜触发点疼痛。这种治疗方法可改善焦虑、抑郁、疲劳症状、生活质量和睡眠。干针和肌筋膜松解治疗可减轻疼痛强度和纤维肌痛症状对该人群的影响。在多学科环境中,这些干预措施应被视为独立的补充治疗方法。