Guedes Cizelene do Carmo Faleiros Veloso, de Freitas Filho Silas Antonio Juvencio, de Faria Paulo Rogério, Loyola Adriano Mota, Sabino-Silva Robinson, Cardoso Sérgio Vitorino
Area of Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology, Area of Pathology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Int J Dent. 2018 Feb 22;2018:4579279. doi: 10.1155/2018/4579279. eCollection 2018.
Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent and severe adverse effect of therapy against head and neck cancer. Photobiomodulation with the low-power laser is known to be effective against OM, but the diversity of protocols and the possibility of stimulating residual tumor cells are still obstacles. The present study aimed to compare two doses of laser energy delivered to the oral mucosa of patients under oncologic treatment for head and neck cancer, looking for differences in the control of mucositis, as well as in the frequency of tumoral recurrences. Fifty-eight patients undergoing radiotherapy were randomized into two groups, distinguished according to the energy delivered by laser irradiation, namely, 0.25 J and 1.0 J. The groups were compared according to frequency, severity, or duration of OM, as well as the frequency of tumoral recurrences. OM was significantly less frequent in patients receiving 1.0 J of energy, but the groups did not differ regarding severity or duration of OM. Tumoral recurrence also did not vary significantly between the groups. Photobiomodulation with a higher dose of energy (1.0 J versus 0.25 J) is associated with better control of radiotherapy-induced OM and does not significantly increase the risk of neoplastic recurrence.
口腔黏膜炎(OM)是头颈癌治疗中常见且严重的不良反应。低功率激光光生物调节疗法已知对OM有效,但方案的多样性以及刺激残留肿瘤细胞的可能性仍是障碍。本研究旨在比较两种剂量的激光能量照射接受头颈癌肿瘤治疗患者的口腔黏膜,寻找在黏膜炎控制以及肿瘤复发频率方面的差异。58例接受放疗的患者被随机分为两组,根据激光照射传递的能量区分,即0.25焦耳和1.0焦耳。比较两组在OM的频率、严重程度或持续时间以及肿瘤复发频率方面的情况。接受1.0焦耳能量的患者中OM的频率显著更低,但两组在OM的严重程度或持续时间方面无差异。两组之间肿瘤复发也无显著差异。更高剂量能量(1.0焦耳与0.25焦耳相比)的光生物调节疗法与更好地控制放疗引起的OM相关,且不会显著增加肿瘤复发风险。