Wang Lamei, Wang Zhenlin
College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University.
Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong;
J Vis Exp. 2018 Apr 6(134):57189. doi: 10.3791/57189.
The protocol for the temptation resistance paradigm was designed to elicit 2- to 8-year-old children's strategic lie-telling behaviors. The reward of transgression was intended to be too tempting to resist, so that children's spontaneous lie-telling behavior in the presence of irreversible evidence due to the transgression could be observed. Conducted in a developmental psychology laboratory behind a one-way mirror and video recorded with a hidden camcorder, the protocol starts with a guessing game where the child is given three trials to guess the identities of hidden objects under an upside down cup. The experimenter gives hints in the first two trials to make sure the child "guess" them correctly. At the beginning of the final trial, the experimenter leaves the room briefly and asks the child not to peek under the cup. If the child could not resist the temptation and peeks, small particles previously filled in the cup would scatter on a grooved surface. Upon the experimenter's return, the child is asked if he/she has peeked. If he/she denies transgression contrary to the presence of the physical evidence, he/she is asked to explain why the particles are on the table. Three responses could be observed in the procedure, including the initial transgression, truth-telling or lie-telling behavior if the child peeked, and the strategic lie-telling behavior in the presence of the physical evidence.
抗诱惑范式的实验方案旨在诱发2至8岁儿童的策略性说谎行为。违规行为的奖励旨在具有极大的诱惑性,让孩子难以抗拒,以便观察到孩子在因违规行为而出现不可逆转的证据时的自发说谎行为。该实验方案在发展心理学实验室中通过单向镜进行,并使用隐藏的摄像机进行录像。实验从一个猜谜游戏开始,孩子有三次机会猜测倒扣杯子下隐藏物体的身份。在前两次试验中,实验者会给出提示,以确保孩子“猜对”。在最后一次试验开始时,实验者短暂离开房间,并要求孩子不要偷看杯子下面。如果孩子无法抗拒诱惑并偷看,事先放在杯子里的小颗粒就会散落在有凹槽的表面上。实验者回来后,会问孩子是否偷看了。如果孩子不顾实物证据而否认违规行为,就会被要求解释为什么颗粒在桌子上。在这个过程中可以观察到三种反应,包括最初的违规行为、如果孩子偷看后的说实话或说谎行为,以及在有实物证据时的策略性说谎行为。