Caskey Sean, Hammond Joshua, Peck Jeffery, Sardelli Matthew, Atkinson Theresa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McLaren Flint.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Aug;38(7):e382-e386. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001189.
Motor vehicle crashes are a significant source of pediatric mortality and morbidity. Studies indicate that booster seats significantly improve seat belt fit for children who have not attained a height of 145 cm (4' 9"). This study examined injuries occurring in booster age children up to age 12, as the majority of children do not attain 145 cm until this age. The purpose of the study was to identify differences in injuries due to the type of restraint used, with attention to musculoskeletal injuries.
Vehicle and occupant data were obtained from a publically available statistical sample of tow-away crashes. Frontal crashes over an 8-year period were examined. A data set of cases was created involving children ages 5 to 12 years who were unrestrained, restrained using the vehicle's lap and shoulder belt, and restrained using a booster seat with the vehicle's lap and shoulder seat belt. Injury severity, frequency, and patterns of distribution were compared.
Unrestrained children experienced moderate to severe injuries 3.8 to 19 times more frequently than children using restraints. There were more injuries to the head and face in unrestrained versus restrained children, but the head and face was the most frequently injured region for all groups. There were no serious cervical spine injuries reported for any group. Lower extremity fractures were not observed in booster seat users but occurred at similar rates in both unrestrained and seat belt restrained children. These fractures occurred in older children who were involved in more severe crashes.
Unrestrained children were more likely to experience moderate and severe injuries than restrained children. The data sample suggests that booster use may reduce the risk of extremity fracture, as there were no extremity fractures in children restrained with booster seats.
This work provides evidence for the efficacy of booster use for preventing orthopaedic injury in children. This evidence can be used to inform parents and establish recommendations for best practices in transporting children.
机动车碰撞是儿童死亡和发病的重要原因。研究表明,增高座椅能显著改善安全带对身高未达到145厘米(4英尺9英寸)儿童的适配性。本研究调查了12岁及以下增高座椅适用年龄儿童的受伤情况,因为大多数儿童直到这个年龄才达到145厘米。该研究的目的是确定因使用的约束装置类型不同而导致的伤害差异,重点关注肌肉骨骼损伤。
从公开的拖走事故统计样本中获取车辆和乘客数据。对8年期间的正面碰撞事故进行了检查。创建了一个病例数据集,涉及5至12岁未使用约束装置、使用车辆腰部和肩部安全带进行约束以及使用增高座椅搭配车辆腰部和肩部安全带进行约束的儿童。比较了伤害严重程度、频率和分布模式。
未使用约束装置的儿童遭受中度至重度伤害的频率比使用约束装置的儿童高3.8至19倍。未使用约束装置的儿童比使用约束装置的儿童头部和面部受伤更多,但所有组中头部和面部都是最常受伤的部位。没有任何一组报告有严重的颈椎损伤。增高座椅使用者未观察到下肢骨折,但未使用约束装置和使用安全带约束的儿童下肢骨折发生率相似。这些骨折发生在卷入更严重碰撞事故的较大儿童中。
未使用约束装置的儿童比使用约束装置的儿童更易遭受中度和重度伤害。数据样本表明,使用增高座椅可能会降低肢体骨折的风险,因为使用增高座椅约束的儿童没有发生肢体骨折。
这项研究为使用增高座椅预防儿童骨科损伤的有效性提供了证据。这一证据可用于告知家长并制定儿童运输最佳实践建议。