School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 23;16(4):e2005987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005987. eCollection 2018 Apr.
A consistent determinant of the establishment success of alien species appears to be the number of individuals that are introduced to found a population (propagule pressure), yet variation in the form of this relationship has been largely unexplored. Here, we present the first quantitative systematic review of this form, using Bayesian meta-analytical methods. The relationship between propagule pressure and establishment success has been evaluated for a broad range of taxa and life histories, including invertebrates, herbaceous plants and long-lived trees, and terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates. We found a positive mean effect of propagule pressure on establishment success to be a feature of every hypothesis we tested. However, establishment success most critically depended on propagule pressures in the range of 10-100 individuals. Heterogeneity in effect size was associated primarily with different analytical approaches, with some evidence of larger effect sizes in animal rather than plant introductions. Conversely, no variation was accounted for in any analysis by the scale of study (field to global) or methodology (observational, experimental, or proxy) used. Our analyses reveal remarkable consistency in the form of the relationship between propagule pressure and alien population establishment success.
一个外来物种成功建立种群的决定因素似乎是引入个体的数量(传播压力),然而,这种关系的形式变化在很大程度上还没有被探索过。在这里,我们使用贝叶斯元分析方法,首次对这种形式进行了定量系统评价。我们评估了传播压力与建立成功率之间的关系,包括无脊椎动物、草本植物和长寿树木,以及陆地和水生脊椎动物等广泛的分类群和生活史。我们发现,传播压力对建立成功率的积极平均效应是我们测试的每一个假设的特征。然而,建立成功率最关键地取决于 10-100 个个体的传播压力范围。效应大小的异质性主要与不同的分析方法有关,一些证据表明,动物引入比植物引入的效应大小更大。相反,研究规模(从野外到全球)或使用的方法(观察、实验或代理)都没有在任何分析中解释任何变化。我们的分析揭示了传播压力与外来种群建立成功率之间关系形式的显著一致性。