Suppr超能文献

确定护士对瞳孔大小及反应评估的评分者间信度。

Determining interrater reliability of nurses' assessments of pupillary size and reaction.

作者信息

Wilson S F, Amling J K, Floyd S D, McNair N D

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Nursing, Houston 77030.

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 1988 Jun;20(3):189-92. doi: 10.1097/01376517-198806000-00011.

Abstract

Pupil changes provide vital information related to the cause and location, and at times, severity of disease processes which alter level of consciousness. Size and reactivity are sensitive to a variety of influences including local eye damage, functional state of brainstem, local systemic drugs, seizures and anoxia. Therefore, accurate measurement of pupillary size and reactivity is essential. The purposes of this study were to determine if pairs of nurses (1) achieved the same measurement of pupil sizes with and without an objective measure, and (2) selected the same descriptor for pupillary reaction to light. Sixty-eight pairs of nurses employed in adult and pediatric units of a large teaching hospital participated in the study. Interrater reliability of pupillary assessment of 136 nurses was determined. There was no significant difference in the reliability of nurses assessing pupillary size regardless of whether they used a penlight pupil gauge to measure or used observation without a pupil gauge. Agreement among the nurses on the pupillary size was high. Agreement on the pupillary reaction, however, was poor to good.

摘要

瞳孔变化提供了与病因、位置相关的重要信息,有时还能反映改变意识水平的疾病进程的严重程度。瞳孔大小和反应性对多种影响因素敏感,包括局部眼部损伤、脑干功能状态、局部全身性药物、癫痫发作和缺氧。因此,准确测量瞳孔大小和反应性至关重要。本研究的目的是确定护士对(1)在有无客观测量的情况下,对瞳孔大小的测量是否一致,以及(2)对瞳孔对光反应是否选择相同的描述词。一家大型教学医院的成人和儿科病房的68对护士参与了该研究。测定了136名护士瞳孔评估的评分者间信度。无论护士是使用笔式瞳孔测量仪测量还是不使用测量仪进行观察,评估瞳孔大小的信度均无显著差异。护士们对瞳孔大小的一致性很高。然而,对瞳孔反应的一致性则为差到中等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验