Suppr超能文献

使用会话分析方法评估基于对话的医疗保健干预措施对经常就诊患者的忠实度。

Using conversation analytic methods to assess fidelity to a talk-based healthcare intervention for frequently attending patients.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;206:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Abstract

The study aim was to assess implementation fidelity (i.e., adherence) to a talk-based primary care intervention using Conversation Analytic (CA) methods. The context was a UK feasibility trial where General Practitioners (GPs) were trained to use "BATHE" (Background,Affect,Trouble,Handling,Empathy) - a technique to screen for psychosocial issues during consultations - with frequently attending patients. 35 GPs received BATHE training between July-October 2015. 15 GPs across six practices self-selected to record a sample of their consultations with study patients at three and six months. 31 consultations were recorded. 21/26 patients in four intervention practices gave permission for analysis. The recordings were transcribed and initially coded for the presence or absence of the five BATHE components. CA methods were applied to assess delivery, focusing on position and composition of each component, and patients' responses. Initial coding showed most of the BATHE components to be present in most contacts. However the CA analysis revealed unplanned deviations in position and adaptations in composition. Frequently the intervention was initiated too early in the consultation, and the BATHE questions misunderstood by patients as pertaining to their presenting problems rather than the psychosocial context for their problems. Often these deviations resulted in reducing theoretical fidelity of the intervention as a whole. A CA approach enabled a dynamic assessment of the delivery and receipt of BATHE in situ revealing common pitfalls in delivery and provided valuable examples of more and less efficacious implementations. During the trial this evidence was used in top-up trainings to address problems in delivery and to improve GP engagement. Using CA methods enabled a more accurate assessment of implementation fidelity, a fuller description of the intervention itself, and enhanced resources for future training. When positioned appropriately, BATHE can be a useful tool for eliciting information about the wider context of the medical visit.

摘要

本研究旨在使用会话分析(CA)方法评估基于谈话的初级保健干预措施的实施保真度(即依从性)。该研究背景为英国的一项可行性试验,其中全科医生(GP)接受了使用“BATHE”(背景、情感、问题、处理、共情)的培训,该技术用于在就诊期间筛查心理社会问题。2015 年 7 月至 10 月期间,35 名全科医生接受了 BATHE 培训。6 家诊所的 15 名全科医生自愿选择在 3 个月和 6 个月时记录他们与研究患者的部分就诊情况。共记录了 31 次就诊。4 家干预诊所的 21/26 名患者同意进行分析。对录音进行了转录,并初步对 5 个 BATHE 成分的存在或缺失进行了编码。应用 CA 方法评估交付情况,重点关注每个成分的位置和组成以及患者的反应。初步编码显示,大多数 BATHE 成分在大多数接触中都存在。然而,CA 分析显示位置的无计划偏差和组成的适应性变化。干预措施通常在就诊早期启动,BATHE 问题被患者误解为与他们的当前问题有关,而不是与他们问题的心理社会背景有关。通常,这些偏差会导致整个干预措施的理论保真度降低。CA 方法能够动态评估 BATHE 的交付和接收情况,当场揭示交付中的常见陷阱,并提供更有效和不太有效的实施的有价值示例。在试验期间,这些证据被用于补充培训,以解决交付问题并提高全科医生的参与度。使用 CA 方法可以更准确地评估实施保真度,更全面地描述干预措施本身,并为未来的培训提供更多资源。当 BATHE 被适当地定位时,它可以成为一种有用的工具,用于引出有关医疗访问更广泛背景的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验