University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 66, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 May 3.
Assertions are speech acts by means of which we express beliefs. As such they are at the heart of our linguistic and social practices. Recent research has focused extensively on the question whether the speech act of assertion is governed by norms, and if so, under what conditions it is acceptable to make an assertion. Standard theories propose, for instance, that one should only assert that p if one knows that p (the knowledge account), or that one should only assert that p if p is true (the truth account). In a series of four experiments, this question is addressed empirically. Contrary to previous findings, knowledge turns out to be a poor predictor of assertability, and the norm of assertion is not factive either. The studies here presented provide empirical evidence in favour of the view that a speaker is warranted to assert that p only if her belief that p is justified.
断言是通过言语行为来表达信念的一种方式。因此,它们是我们语言和社会实践的核心。最近的研究广泛关注断言这一言语行为是否受规范约束,如果是,在什么条件下做出断言是可以接受的。标准理论提出,例如,只有当一个人知道 p 时,才应该断言 p(知识论),或者只有当 p 为真时,才应该断言 p(真理论)。在一系列四项实验中,这个问题得到了实证研究。与之前的发现相反,知识结果并不是断言可接受性的良好预测指标,断言规范也不是事实性的。这里呈现的研究为这样一种观点提供了经验证据,即只有当说话者对 p 的信念是有理由的,她才被允许断言 p。