Suppr超能文献

断言的规范:经验数据。

The norm of assertion: Empirical data.

机构信息

University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 66, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 May 3.

Abstract

Assertions are speech acts by means of which we express beliefs. As such they are at the heart of our linguistic and social practices. Recent research has focused extensively on the question whether the speech act of assertion is governed by norms, and if so, under what conditions it is acceptable to make an assertion. Standard theories propose, for instance, that one should only assert that p if one knows that p (the knowledge account), or that one should only assert that p if p is true (the truth account). In a series of four experiments, this question is addressed empirically. Contrary to previous findings, knowledge turns out to be a poor predictor of assertability, and the norm of assertion is not factive either. The studies here presented provide empirical evidence in favour of the view that a speaker is warranted to assert that p only if her belief that p is justified.

摘要

断言是通过言语行为来表达信念的一种方式。因此,它们是我们语言和社会实践的核心。最近的研究广泛关注断言这一言语行为是否受规范约束,如果是,在什么条件下做出断言是可以接受的。标准理论提出,例如,只有当一个人知道 p 时,才应该断言 p(知识论),或者只有当 p 为真时,才应该断言 p(真理论)。在一系列四项实验中,这个问题得到了实证研究。与之前的发现相反,知识结果并不是断言可接受性的良好预测指标,断言规范也不是事实性的。这里呈现的研究为这样一种观点提供了经验证据,即只有当说话者对 p 的信念是有理由的,她才被允许断言 p。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验