Center for Behavioral Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center, Cleveland Clinic Lutheran Hospital, Cleveland, OH.
Behavioural Services, FirstHealth Moore Regional Hospital, Pinehurst, NC.
Psychosomatics. 2018 Sep-Oct;59(5):490-495. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
Historically, there has been a restrictive approach toward outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in patients with injection drug use (IDU) due to the fear that they might utilize the intravenous catheter to inject illicit substances.
We tested the hypothesis that patients with current IDU on OPAT would have less favorable treatment outcomes compared to those without current IDU.
In this retrospective cohort chart review study of Cleveland Clinic OPAT registry, we identified patients with current IDU by both electronic and manual review. For each patient with current IDU, we identified 3 matched controls among those on OPAT and without current IDU, by propensity score matching on age, sex, OPAT year, and OPAT diagnosis. We compared treatment failure, infection relapse, line infection, hospital readmission, number of emergency room visits, and 90-day mortality, for patients with current IDU and their matched controls.
We identified 39 patients with current IDU and 117 matched controls. Most patients with current IDU (82%) were discharged to skilled nursing facilities, whereas the majority of the control group (74%) was treated at home (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the examined treatment outcomes between the 2 groups.
Patients with current IDU on OPAT did not have less favorable treatment outcomes compared to those without current IDU. Although the reason for this finding could potentially be related to difference in disposition, more studies need to be done to assess safety of home disposition among these patients.
由于担心接受注射药物使用者 (IDU) 会利用静脉导管注射非法物质,历史上对接受门诊肠外抗菌治疗 (OPAT) 的 IDU 患者一直采取限制治疗的方法。
我们检验了一个假设,即在接受 OPAT 的 IDU 患者中,目前有 IDU 的患者与没有 IDU 的患者相比,治疗结果更差。
在克利夫兰诊所 OPAT 登记处的回顾性队列图表审查研究中,我们通过电子和手动审查确定了目前有 IDU 的患者。对于每一位有 IDU 的患者,我们通过倾向评分匹配年龄、性别、OPAT 年份和 OPAT 诊断,在接受 OPAT 治疗且没有 IDU 的患者中确定了 3 名匹配对照者。我们比较了有 IDU 的患者及其匹配对照者的治疗失败、感染复发、导管感染、医院再入院、急诊就诊次数和 90 天死亡率。
我们确定了 39 名有 IDU 的患者和 117 名匹配的对照者。大多数有 IDU 的患者(82%)出院到护理院,而对照组的大多数(74%)在家接受治疗(p < 0.01)。两组在检查的治疗结果方面没有显著差异。
与没有 IDU 的患者相比,接受 OPAT 的目前有 IDU 的患者的治疗结果并不差。尽管这一发现的原因可能与处置方式的差异有关,但仍需要更多的研究来评估这些患者在家中处置的安全性。