Suppr超能文献

少即是多:在环池手术中采用海马旁回切除术或内镜辅助?颞下经小脑幕入路的定性和定量评估。

Less is more: Parahippocampal resection or endoscopic assistance in ambient cistern surgery? Qualitative and quantitative assessment of subtemporal approach.

机构信息

Departament of Neurological Surgery, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jul;53:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

Abstract

The ambient cistern is an arachnoid complex that extends from the crural cistern to lateral border of cerebral colliculi. The subtemporal approach has been recognized as the best access to reach pathologies in the ambient cistern, however many disadvantages exist. The present work aims to analyze quantitatively the area of exposure provided by the subtemporal access. The objective is to evaluate if there are advantages of using the neuroendoscope in conventional subtemporal access when compared to the subtemporal access with resection of the parahippocampal gyrus. A subtemporal approach was performed in six brain hemispheres. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were made. The linear exposition of the vascular structures and the surgical exposure area were evaluated. The linear exposure to the posterior cerebral artery was 5.95 for subtemporal access (ST) and 13.6 for subtemporal access with resection of the parahippocampal gyrus (STh) (p = 0.019). The total exposure area was 104.8 mm for ST and 210.5 for STh (p = 0.0001). Regarding endoscope assistance the medial area, ST was 81.0 mm, and STend was 176.2 mm (p = 0.038). For the total area of exposure, we obtained a value of 210.5 mm for ST and a value of 391.3 mm for STend (p = 0.041). In conventional subtemporal access, the use of the neuroendoscopes avoids the need for resection of the parahippocampal gyrus for better visualization of the ambient cistern structures.

摘要

鞍旁池是一个蛛网膜复合体,从颅底池延伸到大脑脚外侧缘。经颞下入路被认为是到达鞍旁池病变的最佳入路,但存在许多缺点。本研究旨在定量分析经颞下入路提供的暴露面积。目的是评估与海马旁回切除术的经颞下入路相比,神经内镜在传统经颞下入路中是否具有优势。在六个脑半球上进行了经颞下入路。进行了定性和定量分析。评估了血管结构的线性暴露和手术暴露面积。大脑后动脉的线性暴露,经颞下入路为 5.95,海马旁回切除术的经颞下入路为 13.6(p=0.019)。经颞下入路的总暴露面积为 104.8mm,海马旁回切除术的经颞下入路为 210.5mm(p=0.0001)。关于内镜辅助,经颞下入路为 81.0mm,经颞下入路内镜辅助为 176.2mm(p=0.038)。对于总暴露面积,经颞下入路为 210.5mm,经颞下入路内镜辅助为 391.3mm(p=0.041)。在传统的经颞下入路中,使用神经内镜可以避免切除海马旁回,从而更好地观察鞍旁池结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验