• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采矿历史垃圾填埋场的决策指南。

Decision making guidelines for mining historic landfill sites in Flanders.

机构信息

VITO, 200 Boeretang, 2400 Mol, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Department of Bioengineering, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.

OVAM - Public Waste Agency of Flanders, ELFM-division, Stationsstraat 110, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.049. Epub 2018 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.049
PMID:29685606
Abstract

This study aims at showing how the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC) can help to classify potential landfill mining projects with different levels of maturity, from exploration to production, under technical, socio-economic and project-planning aspects. Taking the example of three former landfill sites in Flanders general decision making guidelines regarding the future management of old landfills are provided. Using the ECLAR methodology for the evaluation (E) and classification (CL) of anthropogenic resources (AR), the individual projects, where clean land and/or materials are recovered, are mapped under the three-dimensional UNFC system. The Bornem project, yields a negative Net Present Value (NPV) of -17 Mio € (-44 €/t of excavated waste), i.e. the project is currently not economically viable. In case of changing key parameters the landfill has, however, reasonable prospects for future economic extraction. The Turnhout land development turned out to be economically viable with a NPV of 361,000 € (8 €/t of excavated waste). The Zuienkerke remediation project is at a too early stage to determine its socioeconomic viability. The main focus to compare and prioritize potential landfill mining projects in Flanders should be on (1) site specific conditions (e.g. landfill's composition, land prices), (2) project related factors (e.g. remediation required vs. resource/land recovery, selected technologies and project set-ups, private vs. public evaluation perspective) and (3) the timing of mining, considering future development of costs, prices, laws, available data and information.

摘要

本研究旨在展示联合国资源分类框架(UNFC)如何帮助对不同成熟度的潜在垃圾填埋场开采项目进行分类,从勘探到生产,涉及技术、社会经济和项目规划等方面。以弗拉芒地区的三个前垃圾填埋场为例,提供了关于旧垃圾填埋场未来管理的总体决策指导方针。使用 ECLAR 方法对人为资源(AR)进行评估(E)和分类(CL),将单独的项目(在这些项目中回收清洁土地和/或材料)映射到三维 UNFC 系统下。博恩姆项目的净现值(NPV)为-1700 万欧元(挖掘废物每吨-44 欧元),即该项目目前在经济上不可行。然而,如果改变垃圾填埋场的关键参数,该填埋场仍有合理的未来经济开采前景。特恩豪特土地开发项目的经济可行性净现值为 36.1 万欧元(挖掘废物每吨 8 欧元)。祖因克尔克修复项目处于早期阶段,无法确定其社会经济效益。在弗拉芒地区比较和优先考虑潜在垃圾填埋场开采项目的主要重点应放在(1)特定地点的条件(例如,垃圾填埋场的组成、土地价格)、(2)与项目相关的因素(例如,修复所需与资源/土地回收、选定的技术和项目设置、私人与公共评估视角)以及(3)开采时间,考虑到未来成本、价格、法律、可用数据和信息的发展。

相似文献

1
Decision making guidelines for mining historic landfill sites in Flanders.采矿历史垃圾填埋场的决策指南。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.049. Epub 2018 May 15.
2
Systematic assessment of critical factors for the economic performance of landfill mining in Europe: What drives the economy of landfill mining?系统评估欧洲垃圾填埋场开采经济表现的关键因素:是什么推动了垃圾填埋场开采的经济?
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:674-686. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Quantitative Analysis of Critical Factors for the Climate Impact of Landfill Mining.垃圾填埋场开采的气候影响关键因素的定量分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 5;50(13):6882-91. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01275. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects.评估和选择用于评估垃圾填埋场开采项目的决策方法。
Waste Manag Res. 2015 Sep;33(9):822-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15588586. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of rehabilitating old landfills: A case of Beiyangqiao landfill, Wuhan, China.老垃圾填埋场修复的成本效益分析:以中国武汉北洋桥垃圾填埋场为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):522-531. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1744488.
6
Holistic assessment of a landfill mining pilot project in Austria: Methodology and application.奥地利一个垃圾填埋场开采试点项目的综合评估:方法与应用。
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Jul;34(7):646-57. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16644517. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Landfill mining: Case study of a successful metals recovery project.垃圾填埋场开采:一个成功的金属回收项目案例研究。
Waste Manag. 2015 Nov;45:448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
8
A cost-benefit analysis of landfill mining and material recycling in China.中国垃圾填埋场开采与材料回收的成本效益分析。
Waste Manag. 2015 Jan;35:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Landfill mining: Development of a cost simulation model.垃圾填埋场开采:成本模拟模型的开发
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Apr;34(4):356-67. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16628980. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Assessment of environmental and economic feasibility of Enhanced Landfill Mining.强化垃圾填埋场开采的环境与经济可行性评估。
Waste Manag. 2015 Nov;45:434-47. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Feb 21.