Relich Ryan F, Buckner Rebecca J, Emery Christopher L, Davis Thomas E
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Aug;91(4):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
The incidence of neonatal Group B streptococcal (GBS) disease has significantly declined since the widespread implementation of prenatal screening of expectant mothers for urogenital and gastrointestinal tract GBS colonization. Screening methods have evolved from exclusively culture-based approaches to more rapid and highly sensitive molecular methods. We chose to evaluate the performance of 4 commercially available GBS molecular tests for detection of GBS colonization using 299 antepartum rectal-vaginal specimens submitted to our laboratory for routine GBS screening. In 97% of instances, there was agreement between all 3 systems. When testing 1, 6, and 12 samples simultaneously, all methods performed comparably, but the ARIES® GBS assay required the least total hands-on time and the illumigene Group B Streptococcus assay required the most hands-on time.
自从对孕妇进行泌尿生殖道和胃肠道B族链球菌(GBS)定植的产前筛查广泛实施以来,新生儿GBS疾病的发病率已显著下降。筛查方法已从单纯基于培养的方法发展为更快速、高度敏感的分子方法。我们选择使用提交到我们实验室进行常规GBS筛查的299份产前直肠-阴道标本,评估4种市售GBS分子检测方法检测GBS定植的性能。在97%的情况下,所有3种系统之间存在一致性。当同时检测1、6和12个样本时,所有方法的表现相当,但ARIES® GBS检测所需的总实际操作时间最少,而illumigene B族链球菌检测所需的实际操作时间最多。