Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fresenius Medical Care, Research and Development, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Oct 1;33(10):1832-1842. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy083.
Fluid overload and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) are discrete components of the dynamic fluid balance in haemodialysis patients. We aimed to disentangle their relationship, and the prognostic importance of two clinically distinct, bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS)-derived measures, pre-dialysis and post-dialysis fluid overload (FOpre and FOpost) versus IDWG.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 38 614 incident patients with one or more BIS measurement within 90 days of haemodialysis initiation (1 October 2010 through 28 February 2015). We used fractional polynomial regression to determine the association pattern between FOpre, FOpost and IDWG, and multivariate adjusted Cox models with FO and/or IDWG as longitudinal and time-varying predictors to determine all-cause mortality risk.
In analyses using 1-month averages, patients in quartiles 3 and 4 (Q3 and Q4) of FO had an incrementally higher adjusted mortality risk compared with reference Q2, and patients in Q1 of IDWG had higher adjusted mortality compared with Q2. The highest adjusted mortality risk was observed for patients in Q4 of FOpre combined with Q1 of IDWG [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.66 (95% confidence interval 2.21-3.20), compared with FOpre-Q2/IDWG-Q2 (reference)]. Using longitudinal means of FO and IDWG only slightly altered all HRs. IDWG associated positively with FOpre, but negatively with FOpost, suggesting a link with post-dialysis extracellular volume depletion.
FOpre and FOpost were consistently positive risk factors for mortality. Low IDWG was associated with short-term mortality, suggesting perhaps an effect of protein-energy wasting. FOpost reflected the volume status without IDWG, which implies that this fluid marker is clinically most intuitive and may be best suited to guide volume management in haemodialysis patients.
液体超负荷和透析间体重增加(IDWG)是血液透析患者动态液体平衡的离散组成部分。我们旨在厘清它们之间的关系,以及两种临床上明显的生物电阻抗谱(BIS)衍生指标的预后重要性,即透析前和透析后液体超负荷(FOpre 和 FOpost)与 IDWG 的关系。
我们对 38614 名在血液透析开始后 90 天内进行了一次或多次 BIS 测量的患者进行了回顾性队列研究(2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 2 月 28 日)。我们使用分数多项式回归来确定 FOpre、FOpost 和 IDWG 之间的关联模式,并使用 FO 和/或 IDWG 作为纵向和时变预测因子的多变量调整 Cox 模型来确定全因死亡率风险。
在使用 1 个月平均值的分析中,FO 的第 3 个和第 4 个四分位数(Q3 和 Q4)的患者与参考 Q2 相比,调整后的死亡率风险逐渐升高,而 IDWG 的 Q1 患者与 Q2 相比,调整后的死亡率风险更高。FOpre 的 Q4 和 IDWG 的 Q1 的患者观察到最高的调整后死亡率风险[危险比(HR)=2.66(95%置信区间 2.21-3.20),与 FOpre-Q2/IDWG-Q2(参考)相比]。仅使用 FO 和 IDWG 的纵向平均值略微改变了所有 HR。IDWG 与 FOpre 呈正相关,但与 FOpost 呈负相关,这表明其与透析后细胞外液耗竭有关。
FOpre 和 FOpost 一直是死亡的危险因素。低 IDWG 与短期死亡率相关,这可能表明蛋白质-能量消耗的影响。FOpost 反映了没有 IDWG 的容量状态,这意味着这种液体标志物在临床上最直观,可能最适合指导血液透析患者的容量管理。