Cartoski Mark J, Kiley Meghan, Spevak Philip J
1Department of Paediatrics, Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Cardiol Young. 2018 Jun;28(6):862-867. doi: 10.1017/S1047951118000513. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Although transthoracic echocardiography is the dominant imaging modality in CHD, optimal utilisation is unclear. We assessed whether adherence to the paediatric Appropriate Use Criteria for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography could reduce inappropriate use without missing significant cardiac disease.
Using the Appropriate Use Criteria, we determined the indication and appropriateness rating for each initial echocardiogram performed at our institution during calendar year 2014 (N=1383). Chart review documented ordering provider training, patient demographics, and study result, classified as normal, abnormal, or abnormal motivating treatment within a 2-year follow-up period. We tested whether provider training level or patient age correlated with echocardiographic findings or appropriateness rating.
We found that 83.9% of echocardiograms were normal and that 66.7% had an appropriate indication. Nearly all abnormal results and all results motivating treatment were in appropriate studies, giving an odds ratio of 2.73 for an abnormal result if an appropriate indication was present (95% confidence interval 1.92-3.89, p<0.001). None of the remaining initial abnormal results with less than appropriate indications became significant, resulting in treatment over 2 years. Results suggest a potential reduction in imaging volume of as much as 33% with application of the criteria. Cardiologists ordered nearly all studies resulting in treatment but also more echocardiograms with less appropriate indications. Most examinations were in older patients; however, most abnormal results were in patients younger than 1 year.
The Appropriate Use Criteria can be used to safely reduce echocardiography volume while still detecting significant heart disease.
虽然经胸超声心动图是先天性心脏病(CHD)的主要成像方式,但最佳利用情况尚不清楚。我们评估了遵循儿科门诊经胸超声心动图合理使用标准是否能减少不适当的使用,同时又不遗漏重大心脏疾病。
我们使用合理使用标准,确定了2014年在我们机构进行的每一次初始超声心动图检查的适应证和合理程度评级(N = 1383)。病历审查记录了开单医生的培训情况、患者人口统计学信息以及研究结果,在2年随访期内将结果分类为正常、异常或异常且促使进行治疗。我们测试了医生培训水平或患者年龄是否与超声心动图检查结果或合理程度评级相关。
我们发现83.9%的超声心动图检查结果正常,66.7%有适当的适应证。几乎所有异常结果以及所有促使进行治疗的结果都来自适当的检查,若有适当适应证,出现异常结果的优势比为2.73(95%置信区间1.92 - 3.89,p < 0.001)。其余适应证不足的初始异常结果在2年随访期内均未发展为严重情况,也未导致治疗。结果表明,应用这些标准可能使成像检查量减少多达33%。心脏病专家开出了几乎所有导致治疗的检查单,但也开出了更多适应证不太适当的超声心动图检查单。大多数检查是针对年龄较大的患者;然而,大多数异常结果出现在1岁以下的患者中。
合理使用标准可用于安全地减少超声心动图检查量,同时仍能检测出重大心脏疾病。