Yap D, Goddard S, Ng M, Al-Hussaini A, Owens D
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board , UK.
Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy , UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jul;100(6):459-463. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0069. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Introduction Several methods of securing a tracheostomy tube have been described in the literature including using ties or tapes around the neck and suturing the plastic flange to the neck in various ways. However, there are no wet lab-based studies to objectively determine the force required to displace the tracheostomy tube using different securing techniques. Ours is the first animal tissue simulation study published in the literature. Methods A simulated tracheostomy stoma was created on a sheep neck model. A tracheostomy tube was inserted into the stoma and secured using various methods. Tension tests were conducted to significantly displace the tube from the stoma. Each technique was repeated six times on different sheep necks. All results were analysed using SPSS. Results Repeat measurements indicated that the largest displacement forces come from an oblique direction while the lowest force values were found at the lateral angle. Averages of displacement showed that medially placed sutures required the largest forces in comparison with other securing methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing indicated that medial and continuous suture security resists displacement at forces that otherwise displace flange and interrupted sutures. Conclusions This study has shown that any type of securing suture requires a greater displacement force than the strap of the tracheostomy tube holder alone. Medially placed sutures require a greater displacement force than those placed laterally. Displacement in the lateral direction requires the least force in comparison with movement at perpendicular or oblique angles.
引言
文献中描述了多种固定气管造口管的方法,包括在颈部使用系带或胶带,以及以各种方式将塑料法兰缝合到颈部。然而,目前尚无基于湿实验室的研究来客观确定使用不同固定技术移动气管造口管所需的力。我们的研究是文献中发表的第一项动物组织模拟研究。
方法
在羊颈部模型上创建模拟气管造口。将气管造口管插入造口并使用各种方法固定。进行张力测试以使管子从造口中显著移位。每种技术在不同的羊颈部重复六次。所有结果使用SPSS进行分析。
结果
重复测量表明,最大的移位力来自倾斜方向,而最小的力值出现在外侧角度。移位平均值表明,与其他固定方法相比,内侧放置的缝线需要最大的力。Wilcoxon符号秩检验表明,内侧连续缝合固定在能使法兰和间断缝合移位的力作用下能抵抗移位。
结论
本研究表明,任何类型的固定缝线都比单独使用气管造口管固定带需要更大的移位力。内侧放置的缝线比外侧放置的缝线需要更大的移位力。与垂直或倾斜角度的移动相比,侧向移位所需的力最小。