机器人辅助膀胱切除术的现状
The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy.
作者信息
Tyritzis Stavros Ioannis, Collins Justin W, Wiklund Nils Peter
机构信息
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece.
出版信息
Indian J Urol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):101-109. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_355_17.
Abstract
Robot-assistance is being increasingly used for radical cystectomy (RC). Fifteen years of surgical evolution might be considered a short period for a radical procedure to be established as the treatment of choice, but robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is showing promising results when compared with the current gold standard, open RC (ORC). In this review, we describe the current status of RARC and continue the discussion on the on-going RARC versus ORC debate.
摘要
机器人辅助技术在根治性膀胱切除术（RC）中的应用越来越广泛。对于一种根治性手术而言，15年的手术发展历程可能被认为是确立为首选治疗方法的较短时间，但与当前的金标准——开放性根治性膀胱切除术（ORC）相比，机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术（RARC）正显示出令人鼓舞的结果。在本综述中，我们描述了RARC的当前状况，并继续探讨正在进行的RARC与ORC的争论。
相似文献
1
The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy.机器人辅助膀胱切除术的现状
Indian J Urol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):101-109. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_355_17.
2
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: The Oncologist's Perspective from a Multicentre Study.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在接受围手术期化疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者中的比较：多中心研究中肿瘤学家的观点。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
6
Perioperative complications and oncological safety of robot-assisted (RARC) vs. open radical cystectomy (ORC).机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术（RARC）与开放性根治性膀胱切除术（ORC）的围手术期并发症及肿瘤学安全性
Urol Oncol. 2014 Oct;32(7):966-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Is robot-assisted radical cystectomy justified in the elderly? A comparison of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly ≥75 years old.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术是否适用于老年人？比较 75 岁以上老年膀胱癌患者机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的疗效。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1301-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0035. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
8
National comparison of oncologic quality indicators between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy.开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学质量指标的全国性比较。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Oct;34(10):431.e9-431.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
9
Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.膀胱癌开放及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的复发模式。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术：肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
引用本文的文献
1
Open versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for the Treatment of pT4a Bladder Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗pT4a期膀胱癌：围手术期结果比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;16(7):1329. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071329.
2
Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较单孔与多孔机器人辅助技术在泌尿外科手术中的安全性和有效性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Jan 10;42(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04711-6.
3
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Where we are in 2023.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术：2023 年的现状。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Mar;64(2):107-117. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220384.
4
The feasibility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an experimental study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的可行性：一项实验研究。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):477-482. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04266-y. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
Gender-related outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A multi-institutional study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的性别相关结果：一项多机构研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Jan;63(1):53-62. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210334.
6
A comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in patients over 80 and under 80 years old.80 岁以上与 80 岁以下患者行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和生存结局的对比研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul 6;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02312-4.
7
Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及体内尿流改道术治疗膀胱癌的证据综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):2946-2955. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.19.
8
What's inside.里面有什么。
Indian J Urol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):99-100. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_83_18.
本文引用的文献
1
Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的成本分析
BJU Int. 2018 Mar;121(3):437-444. doi: 10.1111/bju.14044. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Surgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting.社区环境下机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的手术及病理结果
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):337-341. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0740-y. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
In-depth Critical Analysis of Complications Following Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术并体腔内尿流改道术相关并发症的深入批判性分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Apr;3(2-3):273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Safety and Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的安全性和有效性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1109-1120. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0437. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Dramatic impact of blood transfusion on cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy irrespective of tumor stage.无论肿瘤分期如何，输血对根治性膀胱切除术后癌症特异性生存均有显著影响。
Scand J Urol. 2017 Apr;51(2):130-136. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1295399. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion and outcomes after radical cystectomy: a population-based study.根治性膀胱切除术围手术期异体输血与结局：一项基于人群的研究。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1435-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2009-5. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Utilization Trends and Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的应用趋势及短期疗效
Urology. 2017 May;103:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.067. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion Does Not Show a Benefit over Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术相较于开放性根治性膀胱切除术并无优势：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):e0166221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166221. eCollection 2016.
9
Early Recurrence Patterns Following Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group.完全经体腔机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术术后早期复发模式：EAU 机器人泌尿外科分会（ERUS）科学工作组的研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):723-726. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
Impact of surgical margin status on the outcome of bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis.手术切缘状态对根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌结局的影响：一项荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):17258-17269. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12907.
Zotero 插件