Suppr超能文献

用于现场检测的定量环介导等温扩增检测方法的开发。 (原文结尾不完整,翻译可能不太准确,建议补充完整原文以便更准确翻译)

Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of .

作者信息

Thiessen Lindsey D, Neill Tara M, Mahaffee Walter F

机构信息

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, OR, USA.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Apr 20;6:e4639. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4639. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Plant pathogen detection systems have been useful tools to monitor inoculum presence and initiate management schedules. More recently, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was successfully designed for field use in the grape powdery mildew pathosystem; however, false negatives or false positives were prevalent in grower-conducted assays due to the difficulty in perceiving the magnesium pyrophosphate precipitate at low DNA concentrations. A quantitative LAMP (qLAMP) assay using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probe was assessed by grape growers in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Custom impaction spore samplers were placed at a research vineyard and six commercial vineyard locations, and were tested bi-weekly by the lab and by growers. Grower-conducted qLAMP assays used a beta-version of the Smart-DART handheld LAMP reaction devices (Diagenetix, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA), connected to Android 4.4 enabled, Bluetooth-capable Nexus 7 tablets for output. Quantification by a quantitative PCR assay was assumed correct to compare the lab and grower qLAMP assay quantification. Growers were able to conduct and interpret qLAMP results; however, the inoculum quantification was unreliable using the beta-Smart-DART devices. The qLAMP assay developed was sensitive to one spore in early testing of the assay, but decreased to >20 spores by the end of the trial. The qLAMP assay is not likely a suitable management tool for grape powdery mildew due to losses in sensitivity and decreasing costs and portability for other, more reliable molecular tools.

摘要

植物病原体检测系统一直是监测接种体存在情况并启动管理计划的有用工具。最近,一种环介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测方法已成功设计用于葡萄白粉病病理系统的田间应用;然而,由于在低DNA浓度下难以察觉焦磷酸镁沉淀,种植者进行的检测中假阴性或假阳性情况普遍存在。俄勒冈州威拉米特谷的葡萄种植者对一种使用基于荧光共振能量转移的探针的定量LAMP(qLAMP)检测方法进行了评估。定制撞击式孢子采样器放置在一个研究葡萄园和六个商业葡萄园地点,并由实验室和种植者每两周进行一次检测。种植者进行的qLAMP检测使用了Smart-DART手持式LAMP反应设备(美国夏威夷檀香山的Diagenetix公司)的测试版,该设备连接到支持安卓4.4且具备蓝牙功能的Nexus 7平板电脑以输出结果。通过定量PCR检测进行的定量被认为是正确的,用于比较实验室和种植者的qLAMP检测定量结果。种植者能够进行并解读qLAMP结果;然而,使用测试版Smart-DART设备进行接种体定量是不可靠的。所开发的qLAMP检测方法在检测早期对一个孢子敏感,但在试验结束时敏感度降至大于20个孢子。由于敏感度下降以及其他更可靠的分子工具成本降低且便携性提高,qLAMP检测方法不太可能成为葡萄白粉病合适的管理工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b25/5912203/1310777f1e53/peerj-06-4639-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验