Suppr超能文献

对超自然能力的理性思考与信念:这取决于参与程度。

Rational Thinking and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement.

作者信息

Stone Anna

机构信息

University of East London, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2016 Feb;118(1):74-89. doi: 10.1177/0033294115625261.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that lay believers in psychic abilities are more prone to intuitive thinking, less inclined to rational thinking, and have an external locus of control, compared to non-believers. Psychic practitioners, however, may have different characteristics. Psychic practitioners ( n = 31; M age = 42.7 yr., SD = 13.1), lay believers ( n = 33; M age = 33.0 yr., SD = 10.3), and non-believers ( n = 31; M age = 34.4 yr., SD = 15.4) completed questionnaires measuring thinking styles, locus of control, and psychic belief. Comparisons of lay believers with non-believers confirmed previous observations: believers had a higher propensity for intuitive thinking, lower propensity for rational thinking, and more external locus of control. In contrast, practitioners were equivalent to non-believers in rational thinking and had the highest internal locus of control. This highlights the importance of considering level of involvement with psychic practice in understanding the thinking styles of believers. Results suggested that practitioners may have rationalized their beliefs and constructed a coherent model of psychic phenomena that satisfies a propensity for rational thinking within a community of belief.

摘要

先前的研究表明,与不信者相比,相信超自然能力的普通信徒更倾向于直觉思维,不太倾向于理性思维,且具有外部控制点。然而,超自然能力从业者可能具有不同的特征。超自然能力从业者(n = 31;平均年龄 = 42.7岁,标准差 = 13.1)、普通信徒(n = 33;平均年龄 = 33.0岁,标准差 = 10.3)和不信者(n = 31;平均年龄 = 34.4岁,标准差 = 15.4)完成了测量思维方式、控制点和超自然信念的问卷。普通信徒与不信者的比较证实了先前的观察结果:信徒更倾向于直觉思维,理性思维倾向较低,且外部控制点更强。相比之下,从业者在理性思维方面与不信者相当,且具有最强的内部控制点。这凸显了在理解信徒思维方式时考虑参与超自然能力实践程度的重要性。结果表明,从业者可能已经将他们的信念合理化,并构建了一个连贯的超自然现象模型,该模型满足了信仰群体中对理性思维的倾向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验