Good M F, Pombo D, Lunde M N, Maloy W L, Halenbeck R, Koths K, Miller L H, Berzofsky J A
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.
J Immunol. 1988 Aug 1;141(3):972-7.
Current malaria vaccine strategies focus on subunit vaccines that contain one or a limited number of malaria Ag. However, there is widespread nonresponsiveness to many of these Ag probably resulting from Ir gene control. Using a congenic mouse model, we demonstrated that human rIL-2 (as an adjuvant) can overcome Ir gene controlled low immune responsiveness to peptide malaria Ag vaccine candidates [R32tet32, R32LR, and Th2R-NP (NANP)5NA] as determined by the antibody response, providing it is emulsified with the Ag during immunization. This effect is not caused by IL-2 merely acting as a foreign protein and stimulating noncognate help; it requires biologic activity of the IL-2, as determined by studying the effect of inactive rIL-2, which has minimal biologic activity but which has retained its antigenicity. IL-2 does not appear to be working by an effect on priming of specific Th, and IL-2 cannot overcome an Ir gene controlled low T cell proliferative response. IL-2 may have a role to play in human vaccine development where a high titer antibody response to a subunit vaccine is required.
