Liver Institute, PLLC, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;33(11):1882-1888. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14267. Epub 2018 May 24.
Infection is a leading precipitant of acute-on-chronic liver failure. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotics within acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Retrospective study of 457 acute-on-chronic liver failure patients admitted to the University of Arizona Health Network between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Eligibility criteria were as follows: at least 18 years of age and 6 months follow-up, data available to calculate systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and acute-on-chronic liver failure. This study collected patient's clinical features and historical data. Key data points were infection, antibiotic use, and SIRS. This study used Cox proportional hazards to model the effects of clinical factors on risk of death.
A total of 521 of 1243 met the inclusion criteria, and 64 had missing data, leaving 457 patients. Infection resulted in higher hazard (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.3, P = 0.01). Patients with infections and antibiotics, compared with non-infected patients without antibiotics, had higher hazard (HR = 1.633, CI: 1.022-2.609, P = .04). Of those infected patients with antibiotics, SIRS patients experienced higher hazard (HR = 1.9, CI: 1.1-3.0, P = .007). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards associated the following with higher hazard: SIRS (HR = 1.866, CI: 1.242-2.804, P = 0.003), vancomycin (HR = 1.640, CI: 1.119-2.405, P = 0.011), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (HR = 1.051, CI: 1.030-1.073, P < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 1.727, CI: 1.180-2.527, P = 0.005), and hepatic encephalopathy (HR = 1.807, CI: 1.247-2.618, P = 0.002).
Overall, treatment of infection with antibiotics did not improve survival; however, patients not meeting SIRS criteria had better outcomes, and vancomycin was associated with poorer survival among acute-on-chronic liver failure patients.
感染是导致慢加急性肝衰竭的主要诱因。本研究旨在确定抗生素在慢加急性肝衰竭中的安全性和疗效。
回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,亚利桑那大学健康网络收治的 457 例慢加急性肝衰竭患者。纳入标准为:年龄至少 18 岁,随访至少 6 个月,可计算全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和慢加急性肝衰竭的数据。本研究收集了患者的临床特征和历史数据。关键数据点包括感染、抗生素使用和 SIRS。本研究采用 Cox 比例风险模型分析临床因素对死亡风险的影响。
在 1243 例符合纳入标准的患者中,有 521 例患者符合条件,64 例患者数据缺失,最终纳入 457 例患者。感染患者的死亡风险更高(风险比[HR]为 1.6,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.1-1.3,P=0.01)。与未使用抗生素的非感染患者相比,感染且使用抗生素的患者死亡风险更高(HR 为 1.633,95%CI 为 1.022-2.609,P=0.04)。在感染且使用抗生素的患者中,发生 SIRS 的患者死亡风险更高(HR 为 1.9,95%CI 为 1.1-3.0,P=0.007)。多变量 Cox 比例风险模型显示,以下因素与死亡风险增加相关:SIRS(HR 为 1.866,95%CI 为 1.242-2.804,P=0.003)、万古霉素(HR 为 1.640,95%CI 为 1.119-2.405,P=0.011)、终末期肝病模型(HR 为 1.051,95%CI 为 1.030-1.073,P<0.001)、胃肠道出血(HR 为 1.727,95%CI 为 1.180-2.527,P=0.005)和肝性脑病(HR 为 1.807,95%CI 为 1.247-2.618,P=0.002)。
总体而言,抗生素治疗感染并不能提高生存率;然而,未发生 SIRS 标准的患者有更好的预后,而万古霉素与慢加急性肝衰竭患者的生存率降低有关。