• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用日本医疗保险索赔国家数据库对脑深部电刺激进行成本最小化分析。

Cost-Minimization Analysis of Deep-Brain Stimulation Using National Database of Japanese Health Insurance Claims.

作者信息

Akazawa Manabu, Konomura Keiko, Shiroiwa Takeru

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health and Welfare Service, National Institution of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2018 Aug;21(6):548-552. doi: 10.1111/ner.12782. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1111/ner.12782
PMID:29697171
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A new rechargeable dual-channel deep brain stimulation (DBS) system has been introduced for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. However, the clinical value of the device, which has a high cost, remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cost-minimization analysis using a national database of health insurance claims in Japan. DBS-related costs were compared between rechargeable and non-rechargeable devices and estimated across a 20-year period.

RESULTS

Although the price of rechargeable DBS was higher than that of non-rechargeable DBS, we observed total cost-savings of 8.4 million yen across 20 years by considering costs related to implantation surgery, frequency of replacement, and risk of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, real-world evidence indicated that rechargeable dual-channel DBS is a reasonable choice for saving total medical costs. Price revisions should consider cost-effectiveness findings for medical devices.

摘要

目的

一种新型可充电双通道脑深部电刺激(DBS)系统已被引入用于治疗帕金森病和其他运动障碍。然而,这种成本高昂的设备的临床价值仍不明确。

材料与方法

我们利用日本全国健康保险索赔数据库进行了成本最小化分析。比较了可充电和不可充电设备的DBS相关成本,并在20年期间进行了估算。

结果

尽管可充电DBS的价格高于不可充电DBS,但通过考虑植入手术相关成本、更换频率和并发症风险,我们发现在20年期间总成本节省了840万日元。

结论

在本研究中,真实世界证据表明可充电双通道DBS是节省总医疗成本的合理选择。医疗器械的价格调整应考虑成本效益研究结果。

相似文献

1
Cost-Minimization Analysis of Deep-Brain Stimulation Using National Database of Japanese Health Insurance Claims.使用日本医疗保险索赔国家数据库对脑深部电刺激进行成本最小化分析。
Neuromodulation. 2018 Aug;21(6):548-552. doi: 10.1111/ner.12782. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Internal Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: Rechargeable or Not?深部脑刺激中的内置脉冲发生器:是否可充电?
World Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;84(4):1020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 30.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Japan.日本帕金森病患者深部脑刺激的成本效益分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:628-635.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.062. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Reduced long-term cost and increased patient satisfaction with rechargeable implantable pulse generators for deep brain stimulation.可充电植入式脉冲发生器用于脑深部电刺激可降低长期成本并提高患者满意度。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 28;131(3):799-806. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS172995.
5
Rechargeable or Nonrechargeable Deep Brain Stimulation in Dystonia: A Cost Analysis.肌张力障碍中可充电式与不可充电式脑深部电刺激:成本分析
Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):243-247. doi: 10.1111/ner.12550. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease in the United States.美国深部脑刺激治疗晚期帕金森病的成本效益分析
Neuromodulation. 2016 Oct;19(7):689-697. doi: 10.1111/ner.12474. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Implementation of New Technology in Patients with Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation: Switching from Non-Rechargeable Constant Voltage to Rechargeable Constant Current Stimulation.慢性脑深部电刺激患者新技术的实施:从不可充电恒压刺激转换为可充电恒流刺激。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2019;97(5-6):362-368. doi: 10.1159/000505076. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Cost analysis of awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation: a single academic health center experience.清醒与睡眠状态下深部脑刺激的成本分析:单一学术医疗中心的经验
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1517-23. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15433. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
9
Cost-effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病的成本效果分析。
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun;28(6):763-71. doi: 10.1002/mds.25407. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Rechargeable Internal Pulse Generators as Initial Neurostimulators for Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Movement Disorders.可充电式植入式脉冲发生器作为运动障碍患者深部脑刺激的初始神经刺激器
Neuromodulation. 2018 Aug;21(6):604-610. doi: 10.1111/ner.12748. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Economic Evaluation of the Reported Costs of Deep Brain Stimulation.全球深脑刺激报告成本的经济评估。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2024;102(4):257-274. doi: 10.1159/000537865. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Therapeutic anticoagulation complications in the elderly: a case report.老年患者的治疗性抗凝并发症:病例报告。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02781-6.
3
Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines' Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain.经颅聚焦电刺激可改变6-羟基多巴胺诱导的大鼠脑内生物胺变化。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;14(8):706. doi: 10.3390/ph14080706.
4
Cost-minimisation model of magnetic resonance-guided focussed ultrasound therapy compared to unilateral deep brain stimulation for essential tremor treatment in Japan.日本基于成本的磁共振引导聚焦超声治疗与单侧脑深部电刺激治疗特发性震颤的比较模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0219929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219929. eCollection 2019.
5
Dynamics of device-based treatments for Parkinson's disease in Germany from 2010 to 2017: application of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and deep brain stimulation.2010 年至 2017 年德国基于器械的帕金森病治疗动态:持续皮下注射阿朴吗啡、左旋多巴-卡比多巴肠凝胶和深部脑刺激的应用。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019 Jul;126(7):879-888. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02034-8. Epub 2019 Jun 20.