Suppr超能文献

“承诺减少手术出血量”对胃肠道癌症手术可及性和结果的潜在影响。

Potential Impact of "Take the Volume Pledge" on Access and Outcomes for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1079-1089. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002796.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the number of US hospitals that would meet "Take the Volume Pledge" (TVP) volume thresholds and compare outcomes at hospitals meeting and not meeting TVP thresholds.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

TVP aims to regionalize complex cancer resections to hospitals meeting established annual average volume thresholds. There is little data describing the potential impact on patient access if this initiative were broadly implemented or the relationship between these volume thresholds and quality of oncologic care.

METHODS

Hospitals in the National Cancer Database (2006-2012) performing esophagectomy (n = 968), proctectomy (n = 1250), or pancreatectomy (n = 1068) were categorized based on frequency meeting TVP thresholds: always low volume (LV); low annual average and intermittently low volume (ILV); high annual average and intermittently high volume (IHV); always high volume (HV). Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between hospital TVP category, oncologic care processes, and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Few hospitals met annual TVP thresholds (HV or IHV)-esophagectomy 1.6%; proctectomy 19.7%; pancreatectomy 6.6%. The majority of esophagectomy (77.8%) and pancreatectomy (53.4%) and 48.1% of proctectomy patients received care at hospitals not meeting annual TVP thresholds (LV or ILV). While performance for all three procedures was generally better at ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals relative to LV hospitals, there were few differences (none of which were consistent) when comparing ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals to each other.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Few hospitals would meet TVP volume thresholds for complex cancer resections with little difference in outcomes between ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals. While a policy to regionalize complex surgical care may have merit, it could also compromise patient autonomy and limit access to care if patients are unable or unwilling to travel.

摘要

目的

量化符合“参与容量承诺”(Take the Volume Pledge,TVP)容量阈值的美国医院数量,并比较符合和不符合 TVP 阈值的医院的治疗结果。

摘要背景数据

TVP 的目标是将复杂的癌症切除术区域化到符合既定年度平均容量阈值的医院。关于如果广泛实施这一倡议对患者获得治疗的影响,或者这些容量阈值与肿瘤治疗质量之间的关系,目前数据很少。

方法

根据是否经常符合 TVP 阈值,将 National Cancer Database(2006-2012 年)中进行食管切除术(n=968)、直肠切除术(n=1250)或胰腺切除术(n=1068)的医院进行分类:始终低容量(LV);低年度平均容量和间歇性低容量(ILV);高年度平均容量和间歇性高容量(IHV);始终高容量(HV)。使用多变量广义估计方程评估医院 TVP 类别、肿瘤治疗过程和围手术期结局之间的关联。

结果

很少有医院符合年度 TVP 阈值(HV 或 IHV)-食管切除术为 1.6%;直肠切除术为 19.7%;胰腺切除术为 6.6%。大多数食管切除术(77.8%)和胰腺切除术(53.4%)以及 48.1%的直肠切除术患者在不符合年度 TVP 阈值的医院(LV 或 ILV)接受治疗。尽管所有三种手术的治疗效果在 ILV、IHV 和 HV 医院通常优于 LV 医院,但在比较 ILV、IHV 和 HV 医院时,结果差异很小(没有一个是一致的)。

结论和相关性

很少有医院会符合 TVP 对复杂癌症切除术的容量阈值,而 ILV、IHV 和 HV 医院之间的治疗结果差异很小。虽然将复杂的手术治疗区域化的政策可能有其优点,但如果患者无法或不愿意旅行,也可能会损害患者的自主权并限制其获得治疗的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验