Kwon Hye-Young, Yang Bongmin, Godman Brian
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2015 May;6:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
The cost of pharmaceuticals has increased rapidly in Korea in recent years. Expenditure is likely to grow further with the policy of expanding National Health Insurance coverage for the following four disease areas: cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease, rare diseases, and cancer. Consequently, there is a need to analyze the different components leading to this increased expenditure as a basis for suggesting future reforms in Korea.
To quantify the impact of new and established drugs on the growth of total drug spending in South Korea in recent years, specially focusing on the differentiated components of drug spending. These include treatment expansion and drug-mix effects (switching from cheaper drugs to expensive ones and vice versa).
A model was proposed and used to assess the impact of both new and existing drugs on changes in price, quantity, and drug mix over the 5-year period in Korea from 2006 to 2010. The database used was the National Health Insurance claims data, which covers about 97% of the total population of Korea.
Overall drug spending increased 1.43-fold from 2006 to 2010. Drug-mix effect (ε = 1.32) was the main factor contributing to increased drug spending, followed by increased drug utilization (Q = 1.26). For existing drugs, treatment expansion (Q) and drug-mix effect (ε) were measured at 1.28 and 1.24, respectively, while those of new drugs were 1.02 (Q) and 1.03 (ε). Therefore, existing drugs have a much greater effect on drug spending than do new drugs. According to the Anatomical Therapeutic Classification, drug spending rose most significantly for the "sensory organs" class of drugs (E = 1.78) followed by the "various" class (E = 1.68). For existing drugs in the sensory organs class (S), drug-mix effect (ε) was measured at 0.96. This implies that expensive drugs among existing drugs were replaced by cheaper ones. However, the quantity prescribed (Q) substantially increased by 1.88-fold. New drugs within this class that were more expensive than existing ones were also prescribed (ε = 1.09), further increasing drug expenditure in Korea.
We found contrasting results from previous studies. The drug-mix effect and existing drugs made the largest contribution to drug spending growth rather than new drugs. Policies targeting drug mix, such as promoting cost-effective prescription and rational use of drugs, including the use of cheaper cost generics without compromising care, should be primarily considered to help contain future drug expenditure.
近年来,韩国药品成本迅速上升。随着国家健康保险覆盖范围扩大至以下四个疾病领域的政策实施,支出可能会进一步增长:脑血管和心血管疾病、罕见病以及癌症。因此,有必要分析导致支出增加的不同组成部分,以此作为韩国未来改革建议的依据。
量化新药和现有药物对近年来韩国药品总支出增长的影响,特别关注药品支出的不同组成部分。这些组成部分包括治疗范围扩大和药物组合效应(从便宜药物转向昂贵药物以及反之亦然)。
提出并使用一个模型来评估新药和现有药物对2006年至2010年韩国5年期间价格、数量和药物组合变化的影响。所使用的数据库是国家健康保险理赔数据,其覆盖了韩国约97%的总人口。
从2006年到2010年,药品总支出增长了1.43倍。药物组合效应(ε = 1.32)是导致药品支出增加的主要因素,其次是药品使用量增加(Q = 1.26)。对于现有药物,治疗范围扩大(Q)和药物组合效应(ε)分别为1.28和1.24,而新药的相应数值为1.02(Q)和1.03(ε)。因此,现有药物对药品支出的影响远大于新药。根据解剖治疗学分类,“感觉器官”类药物的支出增长最为显著(E = 1.78),其次是“各类”药物(E = 1.68)。对于感觉器官类的现有药物(S),药物组合效应(ε)为0.96。这意味着现有药物中的昂贵药物被更便宜的药物所取代。然而,处方量(Q)大幅增加了1.88倍。该类中比现有药物更昂贵的新药也被处方(ε = 1.09),这进一步增加了韩国的药品支出。
我们发现的结果与之前的研究形成对比。药物组合效应和现有药物对药品支出增长的贡献最大,而非新药。应主要考虑针对药物组合的政策,如促进具有成本效益的处方开具和合理用药,包括在不影响治疗效果的情况下使用更便宜的仿制药,以帮助控制未来的药品支出。