Kidney Institute, Medanta, The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0195536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195536. eCollection 2018.
In critically sick adults, sustained low efficiency dialysis [SLED] appears to be better tolerated hemodynamically and outcomes seem to be comparable to CRRT. However, there is paucity of data in critically sick children. In children, two recent studies from Taiwan (n = 11) and India (n = 68) showed benefits of SLED in critically sick children.
The objective of the study was to look at the feasibility and tolerability of sustained low efficiency daily dialysis-filtration [SLEDD-f] in critically sick pediatric patients.
Design: Retrospective study Inclusion criteria: All pediatric patients who had undergone heparin free SLEDD-f from January 2012 to October 2017. Measurements: Data collected included demographic details, vital signs, PRISM III at admission, ventilator parameters (where applicable), number of inotropes, blood gas and electrolytes before, during, and on conclusion of SLED therapy. Technical information was gathered regarding SLEDD-f prescription and complications.
Between 2012-2017, a total of 242 sessions of SLEDD-f were performed on 70 patients, out of which 40 children survived. The median age of patients in years was 12 (range 0.8-17 years), and the median weight was 39 kg (range 8.5-66 kg). The mean PRISM score at admission was 8.77±7.22. SLEDD-f sessions were well tolerated, with marked improvement in fluid status and acidosis. Premature terminations had to be done in 23 (9.5%) of the sessions. There were 21 sessions (8.6%) terminated due to hypotension and 2 sessions (0.8%) terminated due to circuit clotting. Post- SLEDD-f hypocalcemia occurred in 15 sessions (6.2%), post- SLEDD-f hypophosphatemia occurred in 1 session (0.4%), and post- SLEDD-f hypokalemia occurred in 17 sessions (7.0%).
This study is the largest compiled data on pediatric SLEDD-f use in critically ill patients. Our study confirms the feasibility of heparin free SLEDD-f in a larger pediatric population, and even in children weighing <20 kg on inotropic support.
在危重病成人中,持续低效率透析 [SLED] 在血液动力学方面似乎更能耐受,且结果似乎与 CRRT 相当。然而,危重病儿童的数据很少。在儿童中,来自台湾的两项最近的研究(n = 11)和印度的一项研究(n = 68)表明 SLED 在危重病儿童中有益。
本研究的目的是观察持续低效率每日透析-过滤 [SLEDD-f] 在危重病儿科患者中的可行性和耐受性。
设计:回顾性研究 纳入标准:所有 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 10 月期间接受无肝素 SLEDD-f 的儿科患者。测量:收集的数据包括人口统计学细节、生命体征、入院时 PRISM III、呼吸机参数(如有)、正性肌力药的数量、SLED 治疗前、治疗中和治疗结束时的血气和电解质。收集有关 SLEDD-f 处方和并发症的技术信息。
在 2012-2017 年期间,对 70 名患者共进行了 242 次 SLEDD-f 治疗,其中 40 名患儿存活。患者的中位年龄为 12 岁(范围 0.8-17 岁),中位体重为 39 公斤(范围 8.5-66 公斤)。入院时的平均 PRISM 评分为 8.77±7.22。SLEDD-f 治疗耐受性良好,液体状态和酸中毒明显改善。23 次(9.5%)提前终止。由于低血压终止 21 次(8.6%),由于回路凝块终止 2 次(0.8%)。SLEDD-f 后发生低钙血症 15 次(6.2%),SLEDD-f 后发生低磷血症 1 次(0.4%),SLEDD-f 后发生低钾血症 17 次(7.0%)。
本研究是关于危重病患儿使用 SLEDD-f 的最大综合数据。我们的研究证实了无肝素 SLEDD-f 在更大的儿科人群中,甚至在接受正性肌力药支持的体重<20 公斤的儿童中的可行性。