Airway Disease Infection, National Heart and Lung Institute, Medical Research Council and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Airway Disease Infection, National Heart and Lung Institute, Medical Research Council and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):114-125.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
The innate immune system senses viral infection through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading to type I interferon production. The role of type I interferon and PPRs in rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations in vivo are uncertain.
We sought to compare bronchial mucosal type I interferon and PRR expression at baseline and after rhinovirus infection in atopic asthmatic patients and control subjects.
Immunohistochemistry was used to detect expression of IFN-α, IFN-β, and the PRRs: Toll-like receptor 3, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5, and retinoic acid-inducible protein I in bronchial biopsy specimens from 10 atopic asthmatic patients and 15 nonasthmatic nonatopic control subjects at baseline and on day 4 and 6 weeks after rhinovirus infection.
We observed IFN-α/β deficiency in the bronchial epithelium at 3 time points in asthmatic patients in vivo. Lower epithelial IFN-α/β expression was related to greater viral load, worse airway symptoms, airway hyperresponsiveness, and reductions in lung function during rhinovirus infection. We found lower frequencies of bronchial subepithelial monocytes/macrophages expressing IFN-α/β in asthmatic patients during infection. Interferon deficiency at baseline was not accompanied by deficient PRR expression in asthmatic patients. Both epithelial and subepithelial PRR expression were induced during rhinovirus infection. Rhinovirus infection-increased numbers of subepithelial interferon/PRR-expressing inflammatory cells were related to greater viral load, airway hyperresponsiveness, and reductions in lung function.
Bronchial epithelial IFN-α/β expression and numbers of subepithelial IFN-α/β-expressing monocytes/macrophages during infection were both deficient in asthmatic patients. Lower epithelial IFN-α/β expression was associated with adverse clinical outcomes after rhinovirus infection in vivo. Increases in numbers of subepithelial cells expressing interferon/PRRs during infection were also related to greater viral load/illness severity.
固有免疫系统通过模式识别受体(PRR)感知病毒感染,导致 I 型干扰素的产生。I 型干扰素和 PRR 在鼻病毒引起的哮喘加重中的作用尚不确定。
我们旨在比较特应性哮喘患者和对照者在基线时和鼻病毒感染后支气管黏膜 I 型干扰素和 PRR 的表达。
采用免疫组织化学法检测 10 例特应性哮喘患者和 15 例非哮喘非特应性对照者支气管活检标本中 IFN-α、IFN-β 以及 PRR(Toll 样受体 3、黑色素瘤分化相关基因 5 和维甲酸诱导蛋白 I)的表达,分别在基线时、鼻病毒感染后第 4 天和第 6 周进行检测。
我们观察到哮喘患者在体内 3 个时间点存在支气管上皮 IFN-α/β 缺陷。上皮 IFN-α/β 表达降低与病毒载量更高、气道症状更严重、气道高反应性以及在鼻病毒感染期间肺功能下降有关。我们发现,在感染期间,哮喘患者支气管黏膜下基质中表达 IFN-α/β 的单核细胞/巨噬细胞频率较低。哮喘患者在基线时的 IFN 缺陷并不伴有 PRR 表达缺陷。上皮和黏膜下 PRR 表达均在鼻病毒感染时被诱导。鼻病毒感染增加的黏膜下表达 IFN/PRR 的炎症细胞数量与病毒载量更高、气道高反应性以及肺功能下降有关。
在感染期间,哮喘患者的支气管上皮 IFN-α/β 表达和黏膜下表达 IFN-α/β 的单核细胞/巨噬细胞数量均存在缺陷。上皮 IFN-α/β 表达降低与鼻病毒感染后体内的不良临床结局有关。感染期间黏膜下表达干扰素/PRR 的细胞数量增加也与病毒载量/疾病严重程度有关。