Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat, Spain.
Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat, Spain.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jul;66:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Writing a Bachelor thesis is the last step in obtaining a university degree. The thesis may be job- or research-orientated, but it must demonstrate certain degree-level competences. Rubrics are a useful way of unifying the assessment criteria.
To design a system of rubrics for assessing the competences associated with the Bachelor thesis of a nursing degree, to examine the system's reliability and validity and to analyse results in relation to the final thesis mark.
Cross-sectional and psychometric study conducted between 2012 and 2014.
Nursing degree at a Spanish university.
Twelve tutors who designed the system of rubrics. Students (n = 76) who wrote their Bachelor thesis during the 2013-2014 academic year.
After deciding which aspects would be assessed, who would assess them and when, the tutors developed seven rubrics (drafting process, assessment of the written thesis by the supervisor and by a panel, student self-assessment, peer assessment, tutor evaluation of the peer assessment and panel assessment of the viva). We analysed the reliability (inter-rater and internal consistency) and validity (convergent and discriminant) of the rubrics, and also the relationship between the competences assessed and the final thesis mark.
All the rubrics had internal consistency coefficients >0.80. The rubric for oral communication skills (viva) yielded inter-rater reliability of 0.95. Factor analysis indicated a unidimensional structure for all but one of the rubrics, the exception being the rubric for peer assessment, which had a two-factor structure. The main competences associated with a good quality Bachelor thesis were written communication skills and the ability to work independently.
The assessment system based on seven rubrics is shown to be valid and reliable. Writing a Bachelor thesis requires a range of degree-level competences and it offers nursing students the opportunity to develop their evidence-based practice skills.
撰写学士学位论文是获得大学学位的最后一步。论文可以是面向工作的,也可以是面向研究的,但必须展示一定程度的能力。评分标准是统一评估标准的一种有用方法。
设计一套护理学学士学位论文评估能力的评分标准体系,检验该体系的信度和效度,并分析与最终论文成绩相关的结果。
2012 年至 2014 年进行的横断面和心理测量研究。
西班牙一所大学的护理学学位。
参与制定评分标准体系的 12 名导师。在 2013-2014 学年期间撰写学士学位论文的 76 名学生。
在确定要评估哪些方面、由谁评估以及何时评估后,导师们制定了 7 个评分标准(起草过程、导师和小组对书面论文的评估、学生自我评估、同伴评估、导师对同伴评估和小组对答辩的评估)。我们分析了评分标准的信度(评分者间信度和内部一致性)和效度(收敛和区分效度),以及评估的能力与最终论文成绩之间的关系。
所有评分标准的内部一致性系数均大于 0.80。口头沟通技能(答辩)评分标准的评分者间信度为 0.95。因子分析表明,除了同伴评估评分标准外,所有评分标准都具有单维度结构,而同伴评估评分标准则具有双因素结构。与高质量学士学位论文相关的主要能力是书面沟通能力和独立工作能力。
基于 7 个评分标准的评估体系被证明具有有效性和可靠性。撰写学士学位论文需要一系列的学位水平能力,为护理学生提供了发展循证实践技能的机会。