Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
To explore the literature relating to the use of rubrics in Higher Education.
A systematic search using three databases was undertaken, the question used to guide the search strategy was: What are the benefits and challenges of using rubrics as part of the assessment process in Higher Education?
Three electronic databases were searched: British Education Index, Education Resources Information Centre and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
The review utilised an integrative approach to the retrieval and appraisal of the research. As the papers retrieved used different methodologies to explore the use of rubrics they were analysed using either thematic analysis or narrative synthesis.
Fifteen papers were identified that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review, these spanned a range of disciplines including education, medicine and design. Four main themes related to the use of rubrics were identified: the reliability and validity of the rubric, student performance, students' perceptions of the rubric and the implementation of the rubric.
Student self-assessment, self-regulation and understanding of assessment criteria were all found to be enhanced by the use of rubrics. However students also reported that rubrics could be restrictive and student stress related to assessments could be increased. Student involvement in the design and implementation of a rubric was identified as being critical to their success. Rubrics were judged favourably by the studies reviewed in this paper, however they were found to be most effective when used as part of an overall assessment strategy that was co-created with students.
探索高等教育中使用评分标准的相关文献。
使用三个数据库进行系统检索,用于指导搜索策略的问题是:在高等教育中,将评分标准用作评估过程的一部分有哪些好处和挑战?
在三个电子数据库中进行了搜索:英国教育索引、教育资源信息中心和护理与联合健康文献累积索引。
该综述采用综合方法检索和评估研究。由于检索到的论文使用了不同的方法来探索评分标准的使用,因此使用主题分析或叙述性综合分析对其进行了分析。
确定了符合纳入和排除标准的 15 篇论文,这些论文涵盖了教育、医学和设计等多个学科。确定了与使用评分标准相关的四个主要主题:评分标准的可靠性和有效性、学生表现、学生对评分标准的看法以及评分标准的实施。
使用评分标准被发现可以增强学生的自我评价、自我调节和对评估标准的理解。然而,学生也报告说评分标准可能具有限制性,并且评估相关的学生压力可能会增加。学生参与评分标准的设计和实施被认为是其成功的关键。在本文综述的研究中,评分标准受到了好评,但发现它们在作为与学生共同创建的整体评估策略的一部分时最有效。