• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非的法医面部比对:科学现状

Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science.

作者信息

Steyn M, Pretorius M, Briers N, Bacci N, Johnson A, Houlton T M R

机构信息

Human Variation and Identification Research Unit, School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

Criminal Record Centre, South African Police Services, South Africa.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jun;287:190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006
PMID:29698915
Abstract

Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.

摘要

法医面部比对(FFC)是一种科学技术,用于根据对犯罪现场照片或录像的分析,将嫌疑人与犯罪现场联系起来。虽然面部识别科学工作组提供了实践和培训的基本指南,但关于这些指南在全球范围内如何应用的细节却很少。FFC在南非经常被使用,仅在过去两年就进行了700多次比对。本文概述了实践标准,并提出了新的一致程度/结论水平。我们概述了已确立的三个培训级别,针对面部解剖学、术语、图像比对原理、图像科学、面部识别和计算机技能的培训旨在培养一般能力。针对南非的情况,正在专门开展生成法庭图表和理解法庭案件程序的培训。仍然存在各种缺点,特别是在该技术可靠性的知识方面。这些需要在未来的研究中加以解决。

相似文献

1
Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science.南非的法医面部比对:科学现状
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jun;287:190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.验证法医学面部比较通过形态分析在摄影和闭路电视样本中。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Sep;135(5):1965-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02512-3. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique.法医面部比对:新型分析技术发展中的可采性问题。
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jul;58(4):859-65. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12127. Epub 2013 May 29.
4
Forensic face recognition as a means to determine strength of evidence: A survey.法医面部识别作为确定证据强度的一种手段:一项调查。
Forensic Sci Rev. 2018 Jan;30(1):21-32.
5
Finding Makhubu: A morphological forensic facial comparison.寻找马克胡布:法医面部形态比对
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Apr;285:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
6
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.法医面部比对:现状、局限性与未来方向。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;10(12):1269. doi: 10.3390/biology10121269.
7
The effect of image quality and forensic expertise in facial image comparisons.图像质量和法医专业知识在面部图像比较中的作用。
J Forensic Sci. 2015 Mar;60(2):331-40. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12660. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Identification using face regions: application and assessment in forensic scenarios.基于面部区域的识别:在法医场景中的应用与评估。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
Learning in practice for becoming a professional forensic expert.实践中的学习:成为专业法医专家之路。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Oct 10;222(1-3):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV images?面部图像分析专家在从闭路电视图像中识别个体方面是否比普通大众更胜一筹?
Sci Justice. 2009 Sep;49(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2008.10.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-mortem to ante-mortem facial image comparison for deceased migrant identification.死后与生前面部图像比较在移民死者身份识别中的应用。
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Nov;138(6):2691-2706. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03286-0. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Focus distance estimation from photographed faces: a test of PerspectiveX using 1709 frontal and profile photographs from DSLR and smartphone cameras.从拍摄的人脸估计焦距:使用单反和智能手机拍摄的 1709 张正面和侧面照片对 PerspectiveX 的测试。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Nov;137(6):1907-1920. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03078-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.
法医面部比对:现状、局限性与未来方向。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;10(12):1269. doi: 10.3390/biology10121269.
4
Development of the Wits Face Database: an African database of high-resolution facial photographs and multimodal closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings.维茨面部数据库的开发:一个具有高分辨率面部照片和多模态闭路电视(CCTV)录像的非洲数据库。
F1000Res. 2021 Feb 19;10:131. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.50887.1. eCollection 2021.
5
Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.验证法医学面部比较通过形态分析在摄影和闭路电视样本中。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Sep;135(5):1965-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02512-3. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.面部成像最新进展概述。
Forensic Sci Res. 2018 Oct 29;4(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892. eCollection 2019.