Suppr超能文献

在辅助生殖技术多次失败后,化学法去除透明带与激光辅助孵化的比较

Chemical removal of zona pellucida versus laser assisted hatching after repeated failures of assisted reproductive technology.

作者信息

Nishio Eiji, Moriwaki Takayuki, Yoshii Kumiko, Udagawa Yasuhiro

机构信息

Toyota Memorial Hospital and.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Reprod Med Biol. 2006 Nov 23;5(4):263-267. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2006.00151.x. eCollection 2006 Dec.

Abstract

To evaluate outcomes after zona pellucida removal by pronase or laser assisted hatching in women with repeated assisted reproduction failures. Of 389 procedures (January 2004 to November 2005), 203 control cycles had an intact zona, 116 cycles had chemical removal of the zona and 70 cycles had laser assisted hatching. Rates of pregnancy, implantation and abortion were compared, and pregnancy rate was secondarily evaluated for fresh or frozen-thawed blastocysts. Pregnancy rates were 33.5% (68/203) for controls, 29.3% (34/116) for chemical removal and 30.0% (21/70) for laser. Implantation rates were 24.8% (68/274) for controls, 21.8% (34/156) for chemical removal and 30.0% (21/105) for laser. There were no significant differences among groups. Abortion rates were 15.6% (10/64) for controls, 13.9% (5/36) for chemical removal and 14.3% (3/21) for laser. No difference was observed by blastocyst type for control or laser assisted hatching cycles. In the chemical removal group, both pregnancy and implantation rates were higher for frozen-thawed blastocysts than for fresh blastocysts. (41.5% 13.2% and 30.7% 11.1%, respectively). Assisted hatching did not show a significant benefit. Chemical zona pellucida removal might increase pregnancy rates for frozen-thawed blastocysts. (Reprod Med Biol 2006; 5: 263-267).

摘要

评估在反复辅助生殖失败的女性中,采用蛋白酶或激光辅助孵化去除透明带后的结局。在389例手术(2004年1月至2005年11月)中,203个对照周期的透明带完整,116个周期进行了化学法去除透明带,70个周期进行了激光辅助孵化。比较妊娠率、着床率和流产率,并对新鲜或冻融囊胚的妊娠率进行了二次评估。对照组妊娠率为33.5%(68/203),化学法去除透明带组为29.3%(34/116),激光辅助孵化组为30.0%(21/70)。着床率对照组为24.8%(68/274),化学法去除透明带组为21.8%(34/156),激光辅助孵化组为30.0%(21/105)。各组间无显著差异。流产率对照组为15.6%(10/64),化学法去除透明带组为13.9%(5/36),激光辅助孵化组为14.3%(3/21)。对照或激光辅助孵化周期的囊胚类型未观察到差异。在化学法去除透明带组中,冻融囊胚的妊娠率和着床率均高于新鲜囊胚(分别为41.5%对13.2%和30.7%对11.1%)。辅助孵化未显示出显著益处。化学法去除透明带可能会提高冻融囊胚的妊娠率。(《生殖医学与生物学》2006年;5:263 - 267)

相似文献

2
Beneficial effect of long zona dissection on frozen-thawed blastocysts at a young age.长 zona 切割对年轻冻融囊胚的有益作用。
Reprod Med Biol. 2007 Nov 7;6(4):211-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00187.x. eCollection 2007 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
A follow-up study of children born after diode laser assisted hatching.一项关于二极管激光辅助孵化后出生儿童的随访研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Oct 10;110(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00215-x.
4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验