Klaiman P, Witzel M A, Margar-Bacal F, Munro I R
Department of Speech Pathology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Sep;82(3):403-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198809000-00005.
Eight patients with Down syndrome, aged 9 years and 10 months to 25 years and 4 months, underwent partial glossectomy. Preoperative and postoperative videotaped samples of spoken words and connected speech were randomized and rated by two groups of listeners, only one of which knew of the surgery. Aesthetic appearance of speech or visual acceptability of the patient while speaking was judged from visual information only. Judgments of speech intelligibility were made from the auditory portion of the videotapes. Acceptability and intelligibility also were judged together during audiovisual presentation. Statistical analysis revealed that speech was significantly more acceptable aesthetically after surgery. No significant difference was found in speech intelligibility preoperatively and postoperatively. Ratings did not differ significantly depending on whether the rater knew of the surgery. Analysis of results obtained in various presentation modes revealed that the aesthetics of speech did not significantly affect judgment of intelligibility. Conversely, speech acceptability was greater in the presence of higher levels of intelligibility.
8名唐氏综合征患者,年龄在9岁10个月至25岁4个月之间,接受了部分舌切除术。术前和术后口语单词和连贯语音的录像样本被随机分组,由两组听众进行评分,其中只有一组知道手术情况。仅从视觉信息判断患者说话时的语音美观度或视觉可接受性。从录像带的听觉部分判断语音清晰度。在视听展示过程中也同时判断可接受性和清晰度。统计分析表明,术后语音在美学上的可接受性显著提高。术前和术后语音清晰度没有显著差异。评分结果与评分者是否知道手术情况无关。对各种展示模式下获得的结果进行分析表明,语音美学对清晰度判断没有显著影响。相反,在清晰度较高的情况下,语音可接受性更强。