Suppr超能文献

糖尿病生存质量量表(DQOL)中文版条目删减与验证。

Item reduction and validation of the Chinese version of diabetes quality-of-life measure (DQOL).

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

China Center for Health Economic Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100800, China.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 27;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0905-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Diabetes Quality-of-Life (DQOL) Measure is a 46-item diabetes-specific quality of life instrument. The original English version of the DQOL has been translated into Chinese after cultural adaption, and the Chinese DQOL has been validated in the Chinese diabetic patient population and used in diabetes-related studies. There are two recognized problems with the Chinese DQOL: 1) the instrument is too long, and 2) the non-response rate of certain items is relatively high. This study aimed to develop and validate a short version for the Chinese DQOL.

METHODS

Item reduction was conducted based on the classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT), each combined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Spearman correlation coefficient were employed in validating the short versions.

RESULTS

Both the study sample (n = 2,886) and the validation sample (n = 2,286) were from a longitudinal observation study of Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. The CTT kept 32 items, and the IRT kept 24 items from the original 46-item version. The two short versions were comparable in psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION

The 24-item IRT-based short version of the Chinese DQOL was selected as the preferred short version because it imposes a lower burden on patients without compromising the psychometric properties of the instrument.

摘要

背景

糖尿病生存质量量表(DQOL)是一种 46 项糖尿病特异性生存质量量表。DQOL 的原始英文版本经过文化调适后已被翻译成中文,中文 DQOL 已在中国糖尿病患者人群中得到验证,并在糖尿病相关研究中使用。中文 DQOL 存在两个公认的问题:1)量表过长,2)某些项目的无反应率相对较高。本研究旨在开发和验证中文 DQOL 的简短版本。

方法

根据经典测量理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)进行项目删减,两者均结合探索性因素分析(EFA)。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和斯皮尔曼相关系数验证简短版本。

结果

研究样本(n=2886)和验证样本(n=2286)均来自中国 2 型糖尿病患者的纵向观察研究。CTT 保留了 32 项,IRT 保留了原始 46 项版本中的 24 项。两个简短版本在心理测量特性方面具有可比性。

结论

基于 IRT 的 24 项简短版本被选为首选简短版本,因为它在不影响工具心理测量特性的情况下降低了患者的负担。

相似文献

1
Item reduction and validation of the Chinese version of diabetes quality-of-life measure (DQOL).
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 27;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0905-z.
2
Linguistic and psychometric validation of the Malaysian version of Diabetes Quality of Life-Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI).
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1135-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Developing a quality of life measure for Chinese patients with diabetes.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999 Dec;46(3):259-67. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00091-1.
5
[Translation to portuguese and validation of the Diabetes Quality Of Life Measure (DQOL-Brazil)].
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008 Apr;52(3):515-22. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302008000300012.
6
A Revised Version of Diabetes Quality of Life Instrument Maintaining Domains for Satisfaction, Impact, and Worry.
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jul 22;2018:5804687. doi: 10.1155/2018/5804687. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The best internal structure of the Diabetes Quality of Life Measure (DQOL) in Brazilian patients.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18090-z.
3
Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome scale for chronic kidney disease.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Feb;56(2):653-665. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03702-1. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Psychometric properties of the post-stroke depression scale in the sequelae stage.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 31;14:1130497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130497. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and initial validation of the attitudes toward face mask use scale (ATFMUS).
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 19;8(12):e12349. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12349. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 1;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Oct;23(5):931-977. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09734-9. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
8
Psychometric parameters of food allergy quality of life during an allergen immunotherapy trial.
Allergy. 2022 Sep;77(9):2770-2777. doi: 10.1111/all.15323. Epub 2022 May 2.
10
Health Related Quality of Life Measurements for Diabetes: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;18(17):9245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179245.

本文引用的文献

2
The Scree Test and the Number of Factors: a Dynamic Graphics Approach.
Span J Psychol. 2015 Mar 17;18:E11. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.13.
3
Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states.
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
6
Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
7
Living with diabetes: quality of care and quality of life.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Jan 20;5:65-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S16551.
8
Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):625-32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
9
Disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: A systematic review.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 May;80(2):171-84. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.020. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:5-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0. Epub 2007 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验