Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1124-1130. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4451-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Despite the growing consensus that collaborative care is effective, limited research has focused on the importance of collaborative care fidelity as it relates to mental health clinical outcomes.
To assess the relationship of collaborative care fidelity on symptom trajectories and clinical outcomes among military service members enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial for the treatment of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Study data for our analyses came from a two-parallel arm randomized trial that evaluated the effectiveness of a centralized collaborative care model compared to the existing collaborative care model for the treatment of PTSD and depression. All patients were included in the analyses to evaluate how longitudinal trajectories of PTSD and depression scores differed across various collaborative care fidelity groupings.
A total of 666 US Military Service members screening positive for probable PTSD or depression through primary care.
Disease registry data from a web-based clinical management support tool was used to measure collaborative care fidelity for patients enrolled in the trial. Participant depression and PTSD symptoms were collected independently from research survey assessments at four time points across the 1-year trial period. Treatment utilization records were acquired from the Military Health System administrative records to determine mental health service use.
Consistent and late fidelity to the collaborative care model predicted an improving symptom trajectory over the course of treatment. This effect was more pronounced for patients with depression than for patients with PTSD.
Long-term fidelity to key collaborative care elements throughout care episodes may improve depression outcomes, particularly for patients with elevated symptoms. More controlled research is needed to further understand the influence of collaborative care fidelity on clinical outcomes.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01492348.
尽管越来越多的人认为协作式护理是有效的,但有限的研究主要关注协作式护理的保真度对心理健康临床结果的重要性。
评估协作式护理保真度与参加多地点随机对照试验治疗抑郁和创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 的军事人员的症状轨迹和临床结果之间的关系。
我们分析的数据来自一项两平行臂随机试验,该试验评估了集中协作式护理模式与现有的协作式护理模式治疗 PTSD 和抑郁的有效性。所有患者都包括在分析中,以评估 PTSD 和抑郁评分的纵向轨迹如何因各种协作式护理保真度分组而异。
共有 666 名美国军事人员通过初级保健筛查出可能患有 PTSD 或抑郁。
从基于网络的临床管理支持工具的疾病登记数据中测量了参加试验的患者的协作式护理保真度。在为期 1 年的试验期间,通过研究调查评估在四个时间点独立收集参与者的抑郁和 PTSD 症状。从军事卫生系统管理记录中获取治疗利用记录,以确定心理健康服务的使用情况。
对协作式护理模式的一致和晚期保真度预测了治疗过程中症状轨迹的改善。对于抑郁患者来说,这种效果比 PTSD 患者更为明显。
在整个护理过程中对关键协作护理要素的长期保真度可能会改善抑郁结果,特别是对于症状加重的患者。需要更多的对照研究来进一步了解协作式护理保真度对临床结果的影响。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT01492348。