Huang Pi-Chun, Dai Yu-Ming
Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Vision Res. 2018 May;146-147:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
In the context of natural scenes, we applied the pattern-masking paradigm to investigate how image structure and phase alignment affect contrast-gain control in binocular vision. We measured the discrimination thresholds of bandpass-filtered natural-scene images (targets) under various types of pedestals. Our first experiment had four pedestal types: bandpass-filtered pedestals, unfiltered pedestals, notch-filtered pedestals (which enabled removal of the spatial frequency), and misaligned pedestals (which involved rotation of unfiltered pedestals). Our second experiment featured six types of pedestals: bandpass-filtered, unfiltered, and notch-filtered pedestals, and the corresponding phase-scrambled pedestals. The thresholds were compared for monocular, binocular, and dichoptic viewing configurations. The bandpass-filtered pedestal and unfiltered pedestals showed classic dipper shapes; the dipper shapes of the notch-filtered, misaligned, and phase-scrambled pedestals were weak. We adopted a two-stage binocular contrast-gain control model to describe our results. We deduced that the phase-alignment information influenced the contrast-gain control mechanism before the binocular summation stage and that the phase-alignment information and structural misalignment information caused relatively strong divisive inhibition in the monocular and interocular suppression stages. When the pedestals were phase-scrambled, the elimination of the interocular suppression processing was the most convincing explanation of the results. Thus, our results indicated that both phase-alignment information and similar image structures cause strong interocular suppression.
在自然场景的背景下,我们应用模式掩蔽范式来研究图像结构和相位对齐如何影响双眼视觉中的对比度增益控制。我们测量了在各种类型的基座下带通滤波后的自然场景图像(目标)的辨别阈值。我们的第一个实验有四种基座类型:带通滤波后的基座、未滤波的基座、陷波滤波后的基座(能够去除空间频率)和错位基座(涉及未滤波基座的旋转)。我们的第二个实验有六种基座类型:带通滤波后的、未滤波的和陷波滤波后的基座,以及相应的相位打乱的基座。比较了单眼、双眼和双眼分视观看配置下的阈值。带通滤波后的基座和未滤波的基座呈现出典型的勺形;陷波滤波后的、错位的和相位打乱的基座的勺形较弱。我们采用了一个两阶段的双眼对比度增益控制模型来描述我们的结果。我们推断,相位对齐信息在双眼总和阶段之前影响对比度增益控制机制,并且相位对齐信息和结构错位信息在单眼和眼间抑制阶段引起相对较强的分裂抑制。当基座相位打乱时,消除眼间抑制处理是对结果最有说服力的解释。因此,我们的结果表明,相位对齐信息和相似的图像结构都会引起强烈的眼间抑制。