• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病认知预测认知表现效度。

Illness Perceptions Predict Cognitive Performance Validity.

机构信息

1David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,Los Angeles,California.

2Chicago Neuropsychology Group,Chicago,Illinois.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Aug;24(7):735-745. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000218. Epub 2018 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617718000218
PMID:29704907
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of psychological variables to cognitive performance validity test (PVT) results in mixed forensic and nonforensic clinical samples.

METHODS

Participants included 183 adults who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed, that is, Credible Group or Noncredible Group, based upon their performance on the Word Memory Test and other stand-alone and embedded PVT measures.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified three significant predictors of cognitive performance validity. These included two psychological constructs, for example, Cogniphobia (perception that cognitive effort will exacerbate neurological symptoms), and Symptom Identity (perception that current symptoms are the result of illness or injury), and one contextual factor (forensic). While there was no interaction between these factors, elevated scores were most often observed in the forensic sample, suggesting that these independently contributing intrinsic psychological factors are more likely to occur in a forensic environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness perceptions were significant predictors of cognitive performance validity particularly when they reached very elevated levels. Extreme elevations were more common among participants in the forensic sample, and potential reasons for this pattern are explored. (JINS, 2018, 24, 735-745).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨心理变量与混合法医和非法医临床样本认知绩效有效性测试(PVT)结果的关系。

方法

参与者包括 183 名接受全面神经心理学检查的成年人。根据他们在单词记忆测试和其他独立和嵌入式 PVT 测量中的表现,形成了可信组或不可信组的标准组。

结果

多元逻辑回归分析确定了三个认知绩效有效性的显著预测因素。这些因素包括两个心理构念,例如认知恐惧(认知努力会加剧神经症状的感知)和症状身份(当前症状是疾病或伤害的结果的感知),以及一个情境因素(法医)。虽然这些因素之间没有相互作用,但在法医样本中观察到的得分升高更为常见,这表明这些独立贡献的内在心理因素更可能出现在法医环境中。

结论

疾病认知是认知绩效有效性的重要预测因素,尤其是当它们达到非常高的水平时。在法医样本中的参与者中,极端升高更为常见,并且探讨了这种模式的潜在原因。(JINS,2018,24,735-745)。

相似文献

1
Illness Perceptions Predict Cognitive Performance Validity.疾病认知预测认知表现效度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Aug;24(7):735-745. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000218. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
2
Word Memory Test Performance Across Cognitive Domains, Psychiatric Presentations, and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.跨认知领域、精神疾病表现及轻度创伤性脑损伤的单词记忆测试表现
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 May 1;32(3):306-315. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw107.
3
Response time measures on the Word Memory Test do not add incremental validity to accuracy scores in predicting noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury litigants.在预测轻度外伤性脑损伤诉讼者的非可信性神经认知功能障碍时,单词记忆测试的反应时间测量并不能增加准确性评分的增量有效性。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):1336-1342. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2126320. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
4
Utility of an attention-based performance validity test for the detection of feigned cognitive dysfunction after acquired brain injury.基于注意力的绩效有效性测试在检测后天性脑损伤后伪装认知功能障碍中的效用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr;42(3):285-297. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1710468. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Posttraumatic stress disorder and noncredible symptom reporting on the Trauma Symptom Inventory-2.创伤后应激障碍与创伤症状清单-2 上的不可信症状报告。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jan-Feb;29(1):100-105. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1710511. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire: Operating characteristics in non-pain forensic samples.修正躯体知觉问卷:非疼痛法医样本中的操作特征。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):598-604. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1794868. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.作为嵌入式效度指标的加利福尼亚词语学习测验第二版强制选择识别试验:证据的系统评价
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Sep;22(8):851-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000746.
8
Symptom validity testing in memory clinics: Hippocampal-memory associations and relevance for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment.记忆门诊中的症状真实性测试:海马记忆相关性及其对轻度认知障碍诊断的意义。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(1):59-70. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.751361. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
9
Differentiating poor validity from probable impairment on the medical symptom validity test: a cross-validation study.在医学症状效度测试中区分效度差与可能的损伤:一项交叉验证研究。
Int J Neurosci. 2019 Mar;129(3):217-224. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1526800. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans. Rey 15-Item 测试、识别试验和错误分数在检测混合临床退伍军人样本中非可信神经心理表现的临床效用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Jan;32(1):119-131. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1333151. Epub 2017 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Statistical and Methodological Issues in the Forensic Prediction of Malingering from Validity Tests: Part I: Statistical Issues.从效度测试对诈病进行法医预测中的统计和方法学问题综述:第一部分:统计问题
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Sep;33(3):581-603. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09601-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Quo Vadis Forensic Neuropsychological Malingering Determinations? Reply to Drs. Bush, Faust, and Jewsbury.法医神经心理学伪装鉴定何去何从?对布什博士、浮士德博士和朱斯伯里博士的回应。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Sep;33(3):653-657. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09606-2. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
The Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning and Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Adults with a Traumatic Brain Injury: a Meta-Analysis.
成人颅脑损伤后认知功能与抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):758-806. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09524-1. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Patterns of Cognitive Test Scores and Symptom Complaints in Persons with TBI Who Failed Performance Validity Testing.脑损伤患者认知测试分数和症状抱怨模式与表现性测试失败。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Oct;26(9):932-938. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720000351. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Relationship between trait suggestibility and eating-related behaviors in overweight and obesity.特质暗示性与超重和肥胖人群的饮食行为之间的关系。
Eat Behav. 2020 Apr;37:101380. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2020.101380. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
The Impact of Interictal Discharges on Performance.间期放电对性能的影响。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 8;18(12):88. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0892-9.