• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微血管减压术和伽玛刀手术治疗原发性三叉神经痛患者的疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性研究。

Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression and Gamma Knife Surgery Treatments for Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Zeng Yi Jun, Zhang Heng, Yu Shui, Zhang Wen, Sun Xiao Chuan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e113-e117. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.120. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.120
PMID:29705231
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) treatments for trigeminal neuralgia.

METHOD

Patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia were randomly divided into 2 groups to undergo either MVD or GKS. All patients were followed for 2 years to evaluate efficacy, recurrence rates, and complications of treatment.

RESULTS

Of 441 enrolled patients, 220 were in the MVD group, and 221 were in the GKS group. There were no deaths in either group. At the 2-year follow-up, 183 patients (83%) in the MVD group reported complete pain relief, 5 (2%) had obvious pain relief, and 20 (9%) had no relief. In the GKS group, 55 patients (25%) reported complete pain relief, 106 (48%) had obvious pain relief, and 37 (17%) had no relief. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (0.45% vs. 0.9%) between the 2 groups. The most common complications in the MVD group were chemical meningitis (6%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (4%), and facial palsy (4%). Loss of corneal reflex (6%) and facial numbness (5%) were the most common complications in the GKS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MVD and GKS are effective surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. The rate of complete pain relief in the MVD group was significantly superior to the rate of complete pain relief in the GKS group. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the groups; however, there were more severe complications in the MVD group than in the GKS group.

摘要

目的

比较微血管减压术(MVD)和伽玛刀手术(GKS)治疗三叉神经痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

将原发性三叉神经痛患者随机分为两组,分别接受MVD或GKS治疗。对所有患者进行2年随访,以评估治疗的疗效、复发率和并发症。

结果

441例入组患者中,MVD组220例,GKS组221例。两组均无死亡病例。在2年随访时,MVD组183例患者(83%)报告疼痛完全缓解,5例(2%)疼痛明显缓解,20例(9%)疼痛未缓解。GKS组中,55例患者(25%)报告疼痛完全缓解,106例(48%)疼痛明显缓解,37例(17%)疼痛未缓解。两组复发率无显著差异(0.45%对0.9%)。MVD组最常见的并发症是化学性脑膜炎(6%)、脑脊液漏(4%)和面神经麻痹(4%)。角膜反射丧失(6%)和面麻木(5%)是GKS组最常见的并发症。

结论

MVD和GKS都是治疗三叉神经痛的有效手术方法。MVD组的完全疼痛缓解率显著高于GKS组。两组复发率无显著差异;然而,MVD组的并发症比GKS组更严重。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression and Gamma Knife Surgery Treatments for Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.微血管减压术和伽玛刀手术治疗原发性三叉神经痛患者的疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e113-e117. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.120. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Long-term safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a 497-patient historical cohort study.伽玛刀手术治疗经典型三叉神经痛的长期安全性和有效性:一项纳入497例患者的历史性队列研究
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1079-87. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Long-term outcomes of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective comparison study.微血管减压术和伽玛刀手术治疗三叉神经痛的长期疗效:一项回顾性比较研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Nov;159(11):2127-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3325-7. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Evaluation of Microvascular Decompression as Rescue Therapy for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Patients with Failed Gamma Knife Surgery.评估微血管减压术作为伽玛刀手术失败的三叉神经痛患者的挽救治疗方法。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e86-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.063. Epub 2018 May 26.
5
Study on the Therapeutic Effects of Trigeminal Neuralgia With Microvascular Decompression and Stereotactic Gamma Knife Surgery in the Elderly.微血管减压术和立体定向伽玛刀手术治疗老年三叉神经痛的疗效研究
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jan;30(1):e77-e80. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004999.
6
A prospective cohort study of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.一项关于三叉神经痛患者微血管减压术和伽玛刀手术的前瞻性队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;109 Suppl:160-72. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S25.
7
Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with failed gamma knife surgery: Analysis of efficacy and safety.伽玛刀手术失败的三叉神经痛患者的微血管减压术:疗效与安全性分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;161:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Gamma Knife Surgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia in Cases with Previous Microvascular Decompression.伽玛刀治疗既往接受过微血管减压术的复发性三叉神经痛
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e593-e598. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.062. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Pain-Free Outcomes and Durability of Surgical Intervention for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparison of Gamma Knife and Microvascular Decompression.三叉神经痛手术干预的无痛结局与持久性:伽玛刀与微血管减压术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e732-e746. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.141. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Microvascular decompression after failed Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a safe and effective rescue therapy?微血管减压术后复发三叉神经痛行伽玛刀治疗失败:安全有效的挽救治疗?
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jul;113(1):45-52. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091386.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with outcomes following microvascular decompression for the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术后预后相关因素:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Aug;24(4):227-243. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.4.227. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Meningitis after elective intracranial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence.择期颅内手术后的脑膜炎:患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jun 8;28(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01141-3.
3
Outcome Comparison of Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia Surgical Treatments-An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews.
耐药性三叉神经痛手术治疗的疗效比较——一项Meta分析和系统评价的伞状综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 23;13(4):530. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040530.
4
Effects of microvascular decompression on quality-of-life in trigeminal neuralgia patients aged 70 years and older.微血管减压术对70岁及以上三叉神经痛患者生活质量的影响。
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 3;14:41. doi: 10.25259/SNI_997_2022. eCollection 2023.
5
Outcomes using linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A single-center, retrospective study.使用直线加速器立体定向放射外科治疗三叉神经痛的疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jun 10;13:246. doi: 10.25259/SNI_91_2022. eCollection 2022.
6
The Molecular Basis and Pathophysiology of Trigeminal Neuralgia.三叉神经痛的分子基础与病理生理学
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 25;23(7):3604. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073604.
7
Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia.微血管减压术与双等中心伽玛刀治疗椎基底动脉延长扩张症所致三叉神经痛的比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 30;12:707985. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.707985. eCollection 2021.
8
The incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after elective cranial surgery: a systematic review.择期颅脑手术后并发脑脊液漏的发生率:系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Jun;45(3):1827-1845. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01641-y. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Clinical efficacy of MVD combined with PSR in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia.微血管减压术联合部分感觉神经根切断术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的临床疗效
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Aug;20(2):1582-1588. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8871. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.三叉神经痛的治疗结果——对领域、维度和测量方法的系统评价
World Neurosurg X. 2020 Jan 27;6:100070. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100070. eCollection 2020 Apr.