The Translation of Knowledge Into Practice in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Singapore.

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia known to increase the risk of stroke by at least four times. Stroke-risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis are vital components in AF management. Guidelines are available to standardise AF management, but physicians' adherence to the recommended guidelines has been low. The aims were to: 1. Examine and compare the level of knowledge and current practice in AF management between cardiologists and non-cardiologist physicians in Singapore; 2. Identify physicians' perceived barriers to prescribing oral anticoagulants (OACs) when indicated; 3. Identify strategies to optimise AF management.

METHODS

From June 2017 to August 2017, a cross-sectional online survey involving physicians was conducted in Singapore. The survey instrument was adapted from a previously developed instrument, and validated locally by five cardiologists. It explored the physicians' stroke-risk assessment practices, estimation of stroke risk and benefits of anticoagulation, likelihood of prescribing anticoagulation when indicated, perceived barriers to anticoagulation, and strategies to optimise AF management.

RESULTS

Sixty-three (63) physicians completed the survey (14 cardiologists and 49 non-cardiologist physicians). No significant difference was found between cardiologists and non-cardiologist physicians in their assessment and estimation of stroke risk for stable AF patients. However, when presented with an AF patient with stroke risk, cardiologists were more likely than non-cardiologist physicians to prescribe novel OACs (93% vs. 51%; χ=7.933, p=0.004). Compared to cardiologists, the majority of the non-cardiologist physicians thought the risk of falls were usually or always barriers to prescribing OACs (29% vs 69%; χ=7.579, p=0.006). Among the suggested strategies to support them in AF management, physicians have overwhelmingly rated two as "quite useful" and "very useful": the establishment of clinics for monitoring anticoagulated patients (100%); and involvement of pharmacists in managing patients on warfarin (98.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians possess good knowledge about stroke-risk assessment in AF patients yet it is not translated into effective measures for stroke prevention. Physicians, especially non-cardiologist ones, were not anticoagulating AF patients when indicated. Although novel OACs are safer alternatives to warfarin, non-cardiologist physicians were less inclined to use them for stroke prevention. All physicians opined that establishing anticoagulation clinics and collaborating with pharmacists were useful strategies to optimise AF management. Existing barriers to anticoagulation impeded the translation of knowledge into practice in the management of AF patients in Singapore, for which optimal strategies to optimise AF management are ascertained.